Suppr超能文献

二线含西妥昔单抗治疗方案对 KRAS 野生型转移性结直肠癌患者的影响:来自 ITACa 随机临床试验的结果。

Impact of second-line cetuximab-containing therapy in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the ITACa randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.

Unit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 5;7(1):10426. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11048-9.

Abstract

The ITACa trial was designed to define the role of cetuximab (Cet) and bevacizumab (Bev) in combination with standard chemotherapy (CT, FOLFIRI or FOLFOX4) as first- and second-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer. All patients with WT KRAS tumors who had been enrolled in the first-line trial were randomized onto two independent second-line trials: CT or CT + Cet (study 2A) and CT + Bev or CT + Bev + Cet (study 2B). Patients with mutated KRAS were not eligible for randomization and were treated with CT alone (study 2A) or CT + Bev (study 2B). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). 48 and 56 KRAS WT patients were randomized while 31 and 40 KRAS mutated patients were treated without randomization. Study 2A: median PFS was 3.4 (95%CI 2.3-4.6) and 6.2 (95%CI 4.3-7.8) months for the CT and CT + Cet arms, respectively, with a hazard ratio (HR) = 0.64 (95%CI 0.35-1.16, p = 0.144). Study 2B: median PFS was 7.7 (95%CI 4.1-10.1) and 4.9 (95%CI 3.2-7.0) months for CT + Bev and CT + Cet + Bev arms, respectively, with a HR = 1.31 (95%CI 0.76-2.26, p = 0.330). Notwithstanding limitations due to the small sample size, among patients with WT KRAS the addition of Cet to second-line CT increased PFS, whereas the addition of Cet to CT + Bev was associated with worse PFS.

摘要

ITACa 试验旨在确定西妥昔单抗(Cet)和贝伐珠单抗(Bev)联合标准化疗(CT,FOLFIRI 或 FOLFOX4)在转移性结直肠癌一线和二线治疗中的作用。所有入组一线试验的 WT KRAS 肿瘤患者均被随机分配至两项独立的二线试验:CT 或 CT+Cet(研究 2A)和 CT+Bev 或 CT+Bev+Cet(研究 2B)。突变型 KRAS 患者不符合随机分组条件,仅接受 CT 治疗(研究 2A)或 CT+Bev(研究 2B)。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)。48 名和 56 名 WT KRAS 患者被随机分配,31 名和 40 名 KRAS 突变患者未随机分配。研究 2A:CT 和 CT+Cet 组的中位 PFS 分别为 3.4(95%CI 2.3-4.6)和 6.2(95%CI 4.3-7.8)个月,风险比(HR)分别为 0.64(95%CI 0.35-1.16,p=0.144)。研究 2B:CT+Bev 和 CT+Cet+Bev 组的中位 PFS 分别为 7.7(95%CI 4.1-10.1)和 4.9(95%CI 3.2-7.0)个月,HR 分别为 1.31(95%CI 0.76-2.26,p=0.330)。尽管由于样本量小存在局限性,但在 WT KRAS 患者中,Cet 联合二线 CT 可延长 PFS,而 Cet 联合 CT+Bev 则与较差的 PFS 相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f49/5585399/b0f047e51aea/41598_2017_11048_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验