Sex Transm Dis. 2018 Feb;45(2):75-80. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000699.
Many health departments use a "reactor grid" to determine which laboratory-reported syphilis serologic test results require investigation. We developed a Web-based tool, the Syphilis Reactor Grid Evaluator (SRGE), to facilitate health department reactor grid evaluations and test the tool using data from Seattle & King County, Washington.
We developed SRGE using the R Shiny Web application framework. When populated with a data set including titer results and final disposition codes, SRGE displays the percent of verified early syphilis cases by serologic titer result and patient age in each cell of the grid. The results can be optionally stratified by sex, test type, and previous rapid plasma reagin titer. The impact of closing laboratory results without investigation in cells selected by the user is dynamically computed. The SRGE calculates the percent of all laboratory reports closed ("efficiency gained"), the proportion of all early syphilis cases closed without investigation ("case finding loss"), and the ratio of percent of cases identified for investigation to percent of all laboratory reports investigated ("efficiency ratio"). After defining algorithms, users can compare them side-by-side, combine subgroup-specific algorithms, and export results. We used SRGE to compare the current Public Health-Seattle & King County (PHSKC) reactor grid to 5 alternate algorithms.
Of 13,504 rapid plasma reagin results reported to PHSKC from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2015, 1565 were linked to verified early syphilis cases. Updating PHSKC's current reactor grid could result in an efficiency gain of 4.8% to 25.2% (653-3403 laboratory reports) and case finding loss of 1% to 8.4% (10-99 fewer cases investigated).
The Syphilis Reactor Grid Evaluator can be used to rapidly evaluate alternative approaches to optimizing the reactor grid. Changing the reactor grid in King County to close more laboratory results without investigation could improve efficiency with minimal impact on syphilis case finding.
许多卫生部门使用“反应网格”来确定哪些实验室报告的梅毒血清学检测结果需要调查。我们开发了一个基于网络的工具,即梅毒反应网格评估器(SRGE),以方便卫生部门进行反应网格评估,并使用华盛顿州西雅图和金县的数据对该工具进行测试。
我们使用 R Shiny 网络应用程序框架开发了 SRGE。当用包括滴度结果和最终处置代码的数据填充时,SRGE 会按网格中每个单元格的血清学滴度结果和患者年龄显示经确认的早期梅毒病例的百分比。结果可以按性别、检测类型和以前的快速血浆反应素滴度任选分层。用户选择的单元格中不进行调查而关闭实验室结果的影响是动态计算的。SRGE 计算所有实验室报告关闭的百分比(“获得的效率”)、所有未经调查而关闭的早期梅毒病例的比例(“病例发现损失”)以及需要调查的病例比例与所有调查的实验室报告比例的比值(“效率比”)。在定义算法后,用户可以并排比较它们、组合特定于子组的算法并导出结果。我们使用 SRGE 将当前公共卫生-西雅图和金县(PHSKC)反应网格与 5 种替代算法进行了比较。
2006 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日,向 PHSKC 报告的 13504 例快速血浆反应素结果中,有 1565 例与确诊的早期梅毒病例相关。更新 PHSKC 当前的反应网格可能导致效率提高 4.8%至 25.2%(653-3403 例实验室报告)和病例发现损失 1%至 8.4%(少调查 10-99 例病例)。
梅毒反应网格评估器可用于快速评估优化反应网格的替代方法。在金县更改反应网格以在不进行调查的情况下关闭更多实验室结果可能会提高效率,对梅毒病例发现的影响最小。