Haghani Shima, Sedehi Morteza, Kheiri Soleiman
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Public Health, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran.
J Res Health Sci. 2017 Sep 2;17(3):e00392.
Traditional statistical models often are based on certain presuppositions and limitations that may not presence in actual data and lead to turbulence in estimation or prediction. In these situations, artificial neural networks (ANNs) could be suitable alternative rather than classical statistical methods.
A prospective cohort study.
The study was conducted in Shahrekord Blood Transfusion Center, Shahrekord, central Iran, on blood donors from 2008-2009. The accuracy of the proposed model to prediction of number of return to blood donations was compared with classical statistical models. A number of 864 donors who had a first-time successful donation were followed for five years. Number of return for blood donation was considered as response variable. Poisson regression (PR), negative binomial regression (NBR), zero-inflated Poisson regression (ZIPR) and zero-inflated negative binomial regression (ZINBR) as well as ANN model were fitted to data. MSE criterion was used to compare models. To fitting the models, STATISTICA 10 and, R 3.2.2 was used RESULTS: The MSE of PR, NBR, ZIPR, ZINBR and ANN models was obtained 2.71, 1.01, 1.54, 0.094 and 0.056 for the training and 4.05, 9.89, 3.99, 2.53 and 0.27 for the test data, respectively.
The ANN model had the least MSE in both training, and test data set and has a better performance than classic models. ANN could be a suitable alternative for modeling such data because of fewer restrictions.
传统统计模型通常基于某些可能不存在于实际数据中的预设和限制,从而导致估计或预测出现波动。在这些情况下,人工神经网络(ANN)可能是比经典统计方法更合适的选择。
一项前瞻性队列研究。
该研究在伊朗中部设拉子的设拉子输血中心对2008 - 2009年的献血者进行。将所提出模型预测再次献血次数的准确性与经典统计模型进行比较。对864名首次成功献血的献血者进行了为期五年的跟踪。再次献血次数被视为响应变量。将泊松回归(PR)、负二项回归(NBR)、零膨胀泊松回归(ZIPR)和零膨胀负二项回归(ZINBR)以及人工神经网络模型拟合到数据中。使用均方误差(MSE)标准比较模型。为了拟合模型,使用了STATISTICA 10和R 3.2.2。
PR、NBR、ZIPR、ZINBR和人工神经网络模型在训练数据中的MSE分别为2.71、1.01、1.54、0.094和0.056,在测试数据中的MSE分别为4.05、9.89、3.99、2.53和0.27。
人工神经网络模型在训练数据集和测试数据集中的MSE最小,并且比经典模型具有更好的性能。由于限制较少,人工神经网络可能是对此类数据进行建模的合适选择。