Weis Patrick P, Herbert Cornelia
Department of Psychiatry, University of TübingenTübingen, Germany.
Institute of Psychology and Education, Applied Emotion and Motivation Research, University of UlmUlm, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 22;8:1277. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01277. eCollection 2017.
According to embodiment theories, language and emotion affect each other. In line with this, several previous studies investigated changes in bodily responses including facial expressions, heart rate or skin conductance during affective evaluation of emotional words and sentences. This study investigates the embodiment of emotional word processing from a social perspective by experimentally manipulating the emotional valence of a word and its personal reference. Stimuli consisted of pronoun-noun pairs, i.e., positive, negative, and neutral nouns paired with possessive pronouns of the first or the third person ("my," "his") or the non-referential negation term ("no") as controls. Participants had to quickly evaluate the word pairs by key presses as either positive, negative, or neutral, depending on the subjective feelings they elicit. Hereafter, they elaborated the intensity of the feeling on a non-verbal scale from 1 (very unpleasant) to 9 (very pleasant). Facial expressions (, ), heart rate, and, for exploratory purposes, skin conductance were recorded continuously during the spontaneous and elaborate evaluation tasks. Positive pronoun-noun phrases were responded to the quickest and judged more often as positive when they were self-related, i.e., related to the reader's self (e.g., "my happiness," "my joy") than when related to the self of a virtual other (e.g., "his happiness," "his joy"), suggesting a self-positivity bias in the emotional evaluation of word stimuli. Physiologically, evaluation of emotional, unlike neutral pronoun-noun pairs initially elicited an increase in mean heart rate irrespective of stimulus reference. Changes in facial muscle activity, in particular, were most pronounced during spontaneous evaluation of positive other-related pronoun-noun phrases in line with theoretical assumptions that facial expressions are socially embedded even in situation where no real communication partner is present. Taken together, the present results confirm and extend the embodiment hypothesis of language by showing that bodily signals can be differently pronounced during emotional evaluation of self- and other-related emotional words.
根据具身理论,语言和情感相互影响。与此一致的是,先前的几项研究调查了在对情感词汇和句子进行情感评估时身体反应的变化,包括面部表情、心率或皮肤电导率。本研究从社会角度通过实验操纵一个词的情感效价及其个人指称,来探究情感词汇加工的具身性。刺激材料由代词 - 名词对组成,即积极、消极和中性名词与第一或第三人称的所有格代词(“我的”“他的”)或非指称性否定词(“没有”)作为对照配对。参与者必须根据按键快速将词对评估为积极、消极或中性,这取决于它们引发的主观感受。此后,他们在从1(非常不愉快)到9(非常愉快)的非语言量表上阐述感受的强度。在自发和详尽评估任务期间,持续记录面部表情( , )、心率,并且为了探索目的,还记录皮肤电导率。当积极的代词 - 名词短语与自我相关,即与读者自己相关(例如,“我的幸福”“我的喜悦”)时,比与虚拟他人的自我相关(例如,“他的幸福”“他的喜悦”)时,反应最快且被判断为积极的频率更高,这表明在对词汇刺激的情感评估中存在自我积极偏向。在生理上,与中性代词 - 名词对不同,对情感性的评估最初会引起平均心率增加,而与刺激指称无关。特别是面部肌肉活动的变化,在对与他人相关的积极代词 - 名词短语的自发评估期间最为明显,这符合面部表情即使在没有真实交流伙伴在场的情况下也具有社会嵌入性的理论假设。综上所述,本研究结果通过表明在对自我和他人相关的情感词汇进行情感评估时身体信号的表现可能不同,证实并扩展了语言的具身假设。