Kanazawa Tsutomu, Ohkubo Masaki, Kondo Tatsuya, Miyazawa Takayuki, Inagawa Shoichi
Division of Radiology, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, 1-754 Asahimachi-dohri, Chuo-ku, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan.
Graduate School of Health Sciences, Niigata University, 2-746 Asahimachi-dohri, Chuo-ku, Niigata, 951-8518, Japan.
Radiol Phys Technol. 2017 Dec;10(4):446-453. doi: 10.1007/s12194-017-0417-2. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
The standard method for measuring the slice thickness of magnetic resonance images uses the inclined surface of a wedge (wedge method); it is sensitive to small increases in noise because of the differentiation of the edge response function (ERF) required. The purpose of this study was to improve the wedge method by fitting a curve to the ERF. The curve-fit function was obtained by convolving an ideal ERF (a ramp function) with a Gaussian function to represent ERF blurring. Measurements of 5- and 3-mm slice thicknesses were performed on a 3T scanner using the conventional wedge method, the improved wedge method, and another standard method using an inclined slab (slab method). Subsequently, 0.5- and 0.25-mm slice thicknesses from multiple slices acquired using a three-dimensional sequence were measured using the improved wedge method. When measuring 5-mm slices, the differences in measurements obtained using the improved wedge method and the conventional slab and wedge methods were very small: <0.6% of the 5-mm slice thickness. The difference was ≤1.7% for 3-mm slices. For 0.5- and 0.25-mm slices, the mean values obtained using the improved wedge method were 0.543 ± 0.007 mm and 0.247 ± 0.015 mm, with a 1.2 and 5.9% coefficient of variation across slices, respectively. The improved wedge method is valid and potentially applicable to the measurement of sub-millimeter slice thicknesses.
测量磁共振图像层厚的标准方法是使用楔形物的倾斜表面(楔形法);由于需要对边缘响应函数(ERF)进行微分,所以它对噪声的小幅增加很敏感。本研究的目的是通过对ERF拟合曲线来改进楔形法。通过将理想的ERF(斜坡函数)与高斯函数进行卷积以表示ERF模糊,从而获得曲线拟合函数。在3T扫描仪上使用传统楔形法、改进的楔形法以及另一种使用倾斜板的标准方法(板法)对5毫米和3毫米的层厚进行测量。随后,使用改进的楔形法对通过三维序列采集的多个层面的0.5毫米和0.25毫米层厚进行测量。在测量5毫米层面时,使用改进的楔形法与传统板法和楔形法所获得的测量值差异非常小:小于5毫米层厚的0.6%。对于3毫米层面,差异≤1.7%。对于0.5毫米和0.25毫米层面,使用改进的楔形法获得的平均值分别为0.543±0.007毫米和0.247±0.015毫米,各层面的变异系数分别为1.2%和5.9%。改进的楔形法是有效的,并且可能适用于亚毫米层厚的测量。