Reiner Caecilia S, Karlo Christoph, Petrowsky Henrik, Marincek Borut, Weishaupt Dominik, Frauenfelder Thomas
Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Department of Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009 May-Jun;33(3):390-7. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181806c29.
The purpose was to investigate the influence of slice thickness on multidetector computed tomography (MDCT)- and magnetic resonance (MR)-based liver volumetry.
Twenty patients who underwent liver surgery were imaged with either a 64-slice MDCT (n = 10) or a 1.5-T MR scanner (n = 10). Multidetector computed tomography and MR images were reconstructed using different slice thicknesses (2, 4, 6, and 8 mm). Total liver volumes (TLVs) were measured by 2 independent readers based on different slice thicknesses using semiautomatic software. Results were compared with TLVs based on 2-mm slices that served as standard of reference. The time to perform each volumetry was recorded.
For MDCT volumetry, a statistical difference was seen only between TLVs based on 2-mm versus 8-mm slices (P = 0.012 and P = 0.002 for readers 1 and 2, respectively). For MR volumetry, no statistical difference was seen between TLVs of the standard of reference and TLVs based on 4-, 6-, and 8-mm slices. Regarding the time to perform volumetry, there was a significant gain of time for both readers when volumetry was performed on 6- and 8-mm MDCT slices and on 4-, 6-, and 8-mm MR slices (P < 0.0167) when compared with the standard of reference.
The results of MDCT- and MR-based liver volumetry are dependent on slice thickness. With respect to the precision of calculated volumes and the significant gain of time, 6-mm slices are preferable for computed tomographic imaging, and 8-mm slices are preferable for MR imaging.
本研究旨在探讨层厚对基于多排螺旋计算机断层扫描(MDCT)和磁共振成像(MR)的肝脏容积测量的影响。
20例行肝脏手术的患者分别接受64层MDCT(n = 10)或1.5T MR扫描仪检查(n = 10)。使用不同层厚(2、4、6和8mm)重建MDCT和MR图像。由2名独立阅片者使用半自动软件基于不同层厚测量肝脏总体积(TLV)。将结果与以2mm层厚图像作为参考标准所测得的TLV进行比较。记录每次容积测量所需时间。
对于MDCT容积测量,仅基于2mm与8mm层厚的TLV之间存在统计学差异(阅片者1和阅片者2的P值分别为0.012和0.002)。对于MR容积测量,参考标准的TLV与基于4mm、6mm和8mm层厚的TLV之间无统计学差异。关于容积测量时间,与参考标准相比,当在6mm和8mm MDCT层厚以及4mm、6mm和8mm MR层厚上进行容积测量时,两名阅片者的测量时间均显著缩短(P < 0.0167)。
基于MDCT和MR的肝脏容积测量结果取决于层厚。就计算体积的精度和显著缩短的时间而言,CT成像以6mm层厚为佳,MR成像以8mm层厚为佳。