Wang Ji, Feng Yujun, Agrawal Niti R, Raghavan Srinivasa R
Chengdu Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, People's Republic of China.
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2017 Sep 20;19(36):24458-24466. doi: 10.1039/c7cp04962e.
Wormlike micelles (WLMs) formed from surfactants have attracted much attention for their ability to thicken water in a manner similar to water-soluble polymers. It is known that WLMs are cylindrical filaments that can attain very long contour lengths (∼few μm), akin to chains of polymers with ultra-high molecular weights (UHMWs). In this study, we aim to make a direct comparison between the thickening capabilities of WLMs and UHMW polymers. The chosen surfactant is erucyl dimethyl amidopropyl betaine (EDAB), a C-tailed zwitterionic surfactant known to form particularly long WLMs independent of salt. The chosen polymer is nonionic polyacrylamide (PAM) having an UHMW of 12 MDa. Both EDAB WLMs and the PAM show strong thickening capability in saline water at 25 °C, but the WLMs are more efficient. For example, a 1.0 wt% EDAB WLM sample has a similar zero-shear viscosity η (∼40 000 mPa s) to a 2.5 wt% PAM solution. When temperature is increased, both samples show an exponential reduction in viscosity, but the WLMs are more sensitive to temperature. Microstructural differences between the two systems are confirmed by data from small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) and cryo-transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM). As expected, the key differences are that the WLM chains have a larger core radius (R) and in turn, a longer persistence length (l) than the PAM chains.
由表面活性剂形成的蠕虫状胶束(WLMs)因其能够以类似于水溶性聚合物的方式增稠水而备受关注。已知WLMs是圆柱形细丝,其轮廓长度可达很长(约几微米),类似于超高分子量(UHMWs)聚合物链。在本研究中,我们旨在直接比较WLMs和UHMW聚合物的增稠能力。所选的表面活性剂是芥酸二甲基酰胺丙基甜菜碱(EDAB),一种已知能形成特别长的WLMs且与盐无关的C尾两性离子表面活性剂。所选的聚合物是非离子聚丙烯酰胺(PAM),其超高分子量为12 MDa。在25℃的盐水中,EDAB WLMs和PAM都表现出很强的增稠能力,但WLMs更有效。例如,1.0 wt%的EDAB WLM样品的零剪切粘度η(约40000 mPa s)与2.5 wt%的PAM溶液相似。当温度升高时,两个样品的粘度都呈指数下降,但WLMs对温度更敏感。小角中子散射(SANS)和低温透射电子显微镜(cryo-TEM)的数据证实了这两个系统之间的微观结构差异。正如预期的那样,关键差异在于WLM链的核心半径(R)比PAM链大,相应地,其持久长度(l)也比PAM链长。