• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

言语情境检查表(修订版):针对不口吃的成年人及寻求治疗的口吃成年人的调查

Speech Situation Checklist-Revised: Investigation With Adults Who Do Not Stutter and Treatment-Seeking Adults Who Stutter.

作者信息

Vanryckeghem Martine, Matthews Michael, Xu Peixin

机构信息

University of Central Florida, Orlando.

University of Cincinnati, Ohio.

出版信息

Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017 Nov 8;26(4):1129-1140. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0170.

DOI:10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0170
PMID:28880977
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the Speech Situation Checklist for adults who stutter (SSC) in differentiating people who stutter (PWS) from speakers with no stutter based on self-reports of anxiety and speech disruption in communicative settings. The SSC's psychometric properties were examined, norms were established, and suggestions for treatment were formulated.

METHOD

The SSC was administered to 88 PWS seeking treatment and 209 speakers with no stutter between the ages of 18 and 62. The SSC consists of 2 sections investigating negative emotional reaction and speech disruption in 38 speech situations that are identical in both sections.

RESULTS

The SSC-Emotional Reaction and SSC-Speech Disruption data show that these self-report tests differentiate PWS from speakers with no stutter to a statistically significant extent and have great discriminative value. The tests have good internal reliability, content, and construct validity. Age and gender do not affect the scores of the PWS.

CONCLUSIONS

The SSC-Emotional Reaction and SSC-Speech Disruption seem to be powerful measures to investigate negative emotion and speech breakdown in an array of speech situations. The item scores give direction to treatment by suggesting speech situations that need a clinician's attention in terms of generalization and carry-over of within-clinic therapeutic gains into in vivo settings.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估口吃成人言语情境检查表(SSC)基于在交流情境中焦虑和言语中断的自我报告,在区分口吃者(PWS)与非口吃者方面的有用性。对SSC的心理测量特性进行了检验,建立了常模,并制定了治疗建议。

方法

对88名寻求治疗的口吃者和209名年龄在18至62岁之间的非口吃者进行了SSC测试。SSC由两个部分组成,调查38种言语情境中的负面情绪反应和言语中断,两个部分的情境相同。

结果

SSC情绪反应和SSC言语中断数据表明,这些自我报告测试在统计学上能显著区分口吃者与非口吃者,具有很大的判别价值。这些测试具有良好的内部信度、内容效度和结构效度。年龄和性别不影响口吃者的得分。

结论

SSC情绪反应和SSC言语中断似乎是在一系列言语情境中调查负面情绪和言语障碍的有效措施。项目得分通过指出在泛化以及将诊所内治疗效果应用到实际生活情境方面需要临床医生关注的言语情境,为治疗提供指导。

相似文献

1
Speech Situation Checklist-Revised: Investigation With Adults Who Do Not Stutter and Treatment-Seeking Adults Who Stutter.言语情境检查表(修订版):针对不口吃的成年人及寻求治疗的口吃成年人的调查
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017 Nov 8;26(4):1129-1140. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0170.
2
Behavior Assessment Battery: Normative and Psychometric Investigation Among Polish Adults Who Do and Do Not Stutter.行为评估电池:波兰口吃和非口吃成年人的常模和心理测量学研究。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Oct 19;27(3S):1224-1234. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-ODC11-17-0187.
3
The Speech Situation Checklist-Emotional Reaction: Normative and comparative study of Kannada-speaking children who do and do not stutter.言语情境检查表-情绪反应:口吃和不口吃的卡纳达语儿童的规范和比较研究。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2021 Oct;23(5):559-568. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2020.1862301. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
4
Characteristics of adults who stutter by treatments sought.按寻求的治疗方法划分的口吃成年人的特征。
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2019 Oct;44(3):134-142. doi: 10.1080/14015439.2018.1452976. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
5
Behavior Assessment Battery: A Pilot Study of the Affective, Behavioral, and Cognitive Correlates Surrounding Spasmodic Dysphonia.行为评估量表:痉挛性发声障碍相关情感、行为和认知因素的初步研究
J Voice. 2016 Jan;30(1):53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
6
The impact of threat and cognitive stress on speech motor control in people who stutter.威胁和认知压力对口吃者言语运动控制的影响。
J Fluency Disord. 2014 Jun;40:93-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
7
Life partners' perceptions of the emotional, speech disruptive, and attitudinal correlates of stuttering.生活伴侣对口吃的情绪、言语障碍和态度相关因素的看法。
J Fluency Disord. 2021 Mar;67:105821. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2020.105821. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
8
Anxiety and speaking in people who stutter: an investigation using the emotional Stroop task.口吃者的焦虑与言语表达:一项运用情绪斯特鲁普任务的调查
J Fluency Disord. 2014 Jun;40:44-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
9
Further development and validation of the Unhelpful Thoughts and Beliefs About Stuttering (UTBAS) scales: relationship to anxiety and social phobia among adults who stutter.口吃无益思维与信念量表(UTBAS)的进一步开发与验证:口吃成年人中与焦虑和社交恐惧症的关系
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2011 May-Jun;46(3):286-99. doi: 10.3109/13682822.2010.495369.
10
Intrajudge and Interjudge Reliability of the Stuttering Severity Instrument-Fourth Edition.口吃严重程度量表第四版的评判者内信度和评判者间信度
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017 Nov 8;26(4):1105-1119. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0079.

引用本文的文献

1
Variability of Stuttering in Young Children: Caregivers' Perceptions and Experiences.幼儿口吃的变异性:照顾者的认知与经历
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2025 Jul 10;34(4):1992-2009. doi: 10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00341. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
2
Cannabis Improves Stuttering: Case Report and Interview with the Patient.大麻改善口吃:病例报告和患者访谈。
Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2021 Oct;6(5):372-380. doi: 10.1089/can.2021.0060. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
3
Speech and Anxiety Management With Persistent Stuttering: Current Status and Essential Research.
持续性口吃的言语与焦虑管理:现状与重要研究
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Jan 14;64(1):59-74. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00144. Epub 2021 Jan 5.