Davoodi Somayeh, Haghighi Khosro Sadeghniat, Kalhori Sharareh Rostam Niakan, Hosseini Narges Shams, Mohammadzadeh Zeinab, Safdari Reza
Health Information Management Department, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Occupational Sleep Research Center, Baharloo Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Acta Inform Med. 2017 Jun;25(2):136-140. doi: 10.5455/aim.2017.25.136-140.
Due to growth of occupational diseases and also increase of public awareness about their consequences, attention to various aspects of diseases and improve occupational health and safety has found great importance. Therefore, there is the need for appropriate information management tools such as registries in order to recognitions of diseases patterns and then making decision about prevention, early detection and treatment of them. These registries have different characteristics in various countries according to their occupational health priorities.
Aim of this study is evaluate dimensions of occupational diseases registries including objectives, data sources, responsible institutions, minimum data set, classification systems and process of registration in different countries.
In this study, the papers were searched using the MEDLINE (PubMed) Google scholar, Scopus, ProQuest and Google. The search was done based on keyword in English for all motor engines including "occupational disease", "work related disease", "surveillance", "reporting", "registration system" and "registry" combined with name of the countries including all subheadings. After categorizing search findings in tables, results were compared with each other.
Important aspects of the registries studied in ten countries including Finland, France, United Kingdom, Australia, Czech Republic, Malaysia, United States, Singapore, Russia and Turkey. The results show that surveyed countries have statistical, treatment and prevention objectives. Data sources in almost the rest of registries were physicians and employers. The minimum data sets in most of them consist of information about patient, disease, occupation and employer. Some of countries have special occupational related classification systems for themselves and some of them apply international classification systems such as ICD-10. Finally, the process of registration system was different in countries.
Because occupational diseases are often preventable, but not curable, it is necessary to all countries, to consider prevention and early detection of occupational diseases as the objectives of their registry systems. Also it is recommended that all countries reach an agreement about global characteristics of occupational disease registries. This enables country to compare their data at international levels.
由于职业病的增多以及公众对其后果的认识提高,关注疾病的各个方面并改善职业健康与安全变得极为重要。因此,需要诸如登记处之类的适当信息管理工具,以便识别疾病模式,进而就其预防、早期发现和治疗做出决策。根据各国的职业健康重点,这些登记处在不同国家具有不同特点。
本研究的目的是评估不同国家职业病登记处的各个方面,包括目标、数据来源、负责机构、最小数据集、分类系统和登记流程。
在本研究中,通过MEDLINE(PubMed)、谷歌学术、Scopus、ProQuest和谷歌搜索相关论文。搜索基于英文关键词,针对所有国家,包括“职业病”“与工作相关疾病”“监测”“报告”“登记系统”和“登记处”,并结合各国名称及所有副标题。在将搜索结果分类到表格中后,对结果进行相互比较。
研究了芬兰、法国、英国、澳大利亚、捷克共和国、马来西亚、美国、新加坡、俄罗斯和土耳其这十个国家登记处的重要方面。结果表明,被调查国家的登记处有统计、治疗和预防目标。几乎其余所有登记处的数据来源都是医生和雇主。大多数登记处的最小数据集包括有关患者、疾病、职业和雇主的信息。一些国家有自己专门的职业相关分类系统,一些国家则采用国际分类系统,如ICD - 10。最后,各国的登记系统流程各不相同。
由于职业病通常是可预防但不可治愈的,所有国家都有必要将职业病的预防和早期发现作为其登记系统的目标。此外,建议所有国家就职业病登记处的全球特征达成一致。这将使各国能够在国际层面上比较其数据。