Suppr超能文献

病毒分离株适应性和组织嗜性决定了重复感染的成功与否。

Isolate fitness and tissue-tropism determine superinfection success.

作者信息

Harper S J, Cowell S J, Dawson W O

机构信息

Department of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, Prosser, WA 99350, USA.

Department of Plant Pathology, Citrus Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Lake Alfred, FL 33850, USA.

出版信息

Virology. 2017 Nov;511:222-228. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2017.08.033. Epub 2017 Sep 6.

Abstract

The mechanism of cross-protection, the deliberate infection of plants with a "mild" virus isolate to protect against "severe" isolates, has long been a topic of debate. In our model system, Citrus tristeza virus (CTV), this appears to be genotype-specific superinfection-exclusion, suggesting a simple recipe for cross-protection. However, this concept failed in field trials, which led us to examine the process of superinfection-exclusion more closely. We found that exclusion relies on the relative fitness of the primary versus the challenge isolates, and the host infected, and that significant differences in superinfection success could occur between isolates that differ by as few as 3 nucleotides. Furthermore, we found that exclusion was not uniform throughout the plant, but was tissue-specific. These data suggest that cross-protection is not a simple like-for-like process but a complex interaction between the primary and challenge isolates and the host.

摘要

交叉保护机制,即故意用“温和”病毒分离株感染植物以抵御“严重”分离株,长期以来一直是一个争论的话题。在我们的模型系统柑橘衰退病毒(CTV)中,这似乎是基因型特异性的超感染排斥,这为交叉保护提供了一个简单的方法。然而,这个概念在田间试验中失败了,这促使我们更仔细地研究超感染排斥过程。我们发现,排斥依赖于原始分离株与挑战分离株的相对适合度以及被感染的宿主,并且相差仅3个核苷酸的分离株之间在超感染成功率上可能会出现显著差异。此外,我们发现排斥在整株植物中并不一致,而是具有组织特异性。这些数据表明,交叉保护不是一个简单的同类过程,而是原始分离株与挑战分离株以及宿主之间的复杂相互作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验