Suppr超能文献

3个年龄组(≤70岁;71至80岁,以及≥81岁)严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术的结局比较。

Comparison of Outcome of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Severe Aortic Stenosis in 3 Age Groups (≤70; 71 to 80, and ≥81 Years).

作者信息

Regev Ehud, Finkelstein Ariel, Assali Abid, Barbash Israel, Fefer Paul, Ben-Shoshan Jeremy, Orvin Katia, Konigstein Maayan, Guetta Victor, Kornowski Ran, Segev Amit

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Division of Cardiology, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;120(9):1607-1611. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.060. Epub 2017 Aug 1.

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been widely used for the treatment of aortic stenosis. Most pivotal studies of TAVI included patients with a mean age of over 80 years old. Many young patients may also be considered for TAVI because of severe co-morbidities. We sought to describe a group of patients undergoing TAVI at an age below 70 and to compare them with older patients undergoing the procedure. This study included 1,324 consecutive patients from a 3-center TAVI registry from 2008 to 2014. Patients were divided according to age into 3 groups: patients aged 70 years and below, patients between the ages of 71 and 80, and patients 81 years and older. Patients in the younger group had higher body mass index (p <0.001), higher proportion of previous stroke (p = 0.05), peripheral vascular disease (p = 0.03), and diabetes mellitus (p <0.001). Thirty percent of patients in the younger group had functional class IV. Corticosteroids treatment was 5-fold higher in the younger group (p <0.001). Average valve area was lower in the older group (p = 0.004). Thirty-day mortality was similar between the 3 groups. We found no difference in the rate of in-hospital complications. One-year all-cause mortality rate of patients aged 70 years, 71 to 80 years, and >80 years was 7.6%, 7.5%, and 12.6%, respectively, p = 0.01. In conclusion, younger patients undergoing TAVI exhibited higher prevalence of risk factors and co-morbidities that probably explain the decision to perform TAVI rather than surgical aortic valve replacement. Nevertheless, the 1-year mortality of these patients was significantly lower than in older patients.

摘要

经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)已被广泛用于治疗主动脉瓣狭窄。TAVI的大多数关键研究纳入的患者平均年龄超过80岁。由于严重的合并症,许多年轻患者也可能适合接受TAVI治疗。我们试图描述一组年龄在70岁以下接受TAVI治疗的患者,并将他们与接受该手术的老年患者进行比较。本研究纳入了2008年至2014年来自一个3中心TAVI注册研究的1324例连续患者。患者按年龄分为3组:70岁及以下患者、71至80岁患者和81岁及以上患者。较年轻组患者的体重指数更高(p<0.001),既往中风比例更高(p = 0.05)、外周血管疾病比例更高(p = 0.03)以及糖尿病比例更高(p<0.001)。较年轻组30%的患者心功能分级为IV级。较年轻组接受皮质类固醇治疗的比例高出5倍(p<0.001)。老年组的平均瓣口面积更低(p = 0.004)。3组之间的30天死亡率相似。我们发现住院并发症发生率没有差异。70岁、71至80岁和>80岁患者的1年全因死亡率分别为7.6%、7.5%和12.6%,p = 0.01。总之,接受TAVI治疗的年轻患者表现出更高的危险因素和合并症患病率,这可能解释了选择进行TAVI而非外科主动脉瓣置换术的原因。然而,这些患者的1年死亡率显著低于老年患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验