South Carolina First Steps to School Readiness, 1300 Sumter Street, Suite 100, Columbia, SC 29201, United States.
Institute for Families in Society, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, United States.
Res Dev Disabil. 2017 Nov;70:50-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
In the field of early intervention, only a few studies of parenting interventions include both participant and facilitator behaviors. Fidelity and supervision (facilitator characteristics) and dosage and satisfaction (participant characteristics) were tested on the outcome of improved parenting style in a sample of 36 parents of young children with disabilities. Results indicated that the facilitator behavior of fidelity was significantly and negatively related to the program outcome of parenting style; no effect was found for the facilitator behavior of supervision. For the participant behaviors, both dosage and satisfaction had non-significant relationships with the program outcome of parenting style at follow-up. The surprising negative relationship between content fidelity and parenting style was discussed.Two possible explanations were: (1) process or quality of intervention delivery is more influential than content fidelity, which considers only adherence to the intervention manual, and (2) the developmental stage of early intervention families calls for more focus on relationships between facilitators and parents and less on content of the specific intervention.
在早期干预领域,只有少数育儿干预研究同时包含了参与者和促进者的行为。在一项针对 36 名残疾幼儿家长的样本中,对亲职教育方式改善的结果进行了诚信和监督(促进者特征)以及剂量和满意度(参与者特征)的测试。结果表明,诚信促进者行为与亲职教育方式的方案结果呈显著负相关;监督促进者行为则没有影响。对于参与者行为,在随访时,剂量和满意度与亲职教育方式的方案结果均无显著关系。内容诚信与亲职教育方式之间出人意料的负面关系进行了讨论。有两种可能的解释:(1)干预传递的过程或质量比仅考虑对干预手册的遵守更有影响力,而内容诚信就是仅考虑对干预手册的遵守;(2)早期干预家庭的发展阶段需要更多地关注促进者和父母之间的关系,而不是特定干预的内容。