Suppr超能文献

在一项随机对照试验中,比较伐伦克林与安慰剂戒烟效果的影响因素。

Moderators of smoking cessation outcomes in a randomized-controlled trial of varenicline versus placebo.

机构信息

Mind Research Network and Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Institute, 1101 Yale Blvd NE, Albuquerque, NM, 87106, USA.

University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.

出版信息

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Dec;234(23-24):3417-3429. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4721-7. Epub 2017 Sep 9.

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE

Varenicline has gained a reputation as the optimal intervention for treatment resistant smokers, yet more than half of those who try it do not succeed. To better understand individual differences in the effectiveness of varenicline, this study evaluates the effectiveness of varenicline for smoking cessation in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial and examines the influence of psychological factors on treatment outcome.

METHOD

Two hundred five cigarette smokers interested in quitting were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of varenicline or placebo. Outcomes examined were CO-confirmed continuous abstinence for the past month, average number of cigarettes smoked per day, and 7-day point prevalence.

RESULTS

Varenicline-treated participants were more likely than placebo to achieve continuous abstinence at the end of treatment (OR = 3.29; RR = 2.62), and 7-day point prevalence rates showed an effect of medication at each time point. Participants in both groups significantly reduced their smoking during the course of treatment and follow-up, and the medication by visit interaction was significant in the expected direction. Impulsivity and personality style emerged as moderators of the relationship between medication condition and treatment outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to replicating efficacy results for varenicline versus placebo, the present study shows that the efficacy of pharmacotherapy is influenced by psychological factors. In an era where pharmacotherapy is often perceived as the "silver bullet," we are reminded that smoking cessation is a dynamic process and intervention must be adaptable to address individual differences.

摘要

理由和目的

伐伦克林作为治疗抵抗性吸烟者的最佳干预措施而声名鹊起,但尝试该药物的人中超过一半没有成功。为了更好地了解伐伦克林有效性的个体差异,本研究通过双盲、安慰剂对照、随机临床试验评估了伐伦克林在戒烟方面的有效性,并研究了心理因素对治疗结果的影响。

方法

205 名有戒烟意愿的吸烟者被随机分配到 12 周的伐伦克林或安慰剂治疗组。评估的结果是过去一个月的 CO 确认连续戒烟、平均每天吸烟量和 7 天点患病率。

结果

与安慰剂组相比,接受伐伦克林治疗的参与者在治疗结束时更有可能实现连续戒烟(OR=3.29;RR=2.62),并且 7 天点患病率在每个时间点都显示出药物的作用。两组参与者在治疗过程中和随访期间都显著减少了吸烟量,药物与就诊时间的交互作用具有预期的方向。冲动性和人格类型是药物条件与治疗结果之间关系的调节因素。

结论

除了复制伐伦克林与安慰剂相比的疗效结果外,本研究还表明,药物治疗的疗效受心理因素的影响。在药物治疗常被视为“银弹”的时代,我们被提醒,戒烟是一个动态的过程,干预措施必须适应个体差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验