Suppr超能文献

基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)与16S核糖体RNA(rRNA)测序对比:两种方法在拟杆菌属菌株鉴定中的细微差异

MALDI-TOF MS versus 16S rRNA sequencing: Minor discrepancy between tools in identification of Bacteroides isolates.

作者信息

Sárvári Károly Péter, Sóki József, Iván Miklós, Miszti Cecilia, Latkóczy Krisztina, Melegh Szilvia Zsóka, Urbán Edit

机构信息

1 Institute of Clinical Microbiology, University of Szeged , Szeged, Hungary.

2 Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Semmelweis University , Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung. 2018 Jun 1;65(2):173-181. doi: 10.1556/030.64.2017.025. Epub 2017 Sep 11.

Abstract

Members of the genus Bacteroides are important components of the normal microbiota of gastrointestinal tract; however, as opportunistic pathogens are also associated with severe or even life-threatening infections with significant mortality. Various species within Bacteroides fragilis group are phenotypically very similar; thus, their identifications with traditional-automated biochemical methods are frequently inaccurate. The identification of the newly discovered or reclassified bacteria can be doubtful because of the lack of biochemical profile in the database of these tests. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) method by testing of 400 Hungarian Bacteroides clinical isolates. Inaccurate identification results with MALDI-TOF MS were confirmed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and findings were compared with traditional-automated biochemical test rapid ID 32A method as well.

摘要

拟杆菌属的成员是胃肠道正常微生物群的重要组成部分;然而,作为机会性病原体,它们也与严重甚至危及生命的感染相关,死亡率很高。脆弱拟杆菌群中的各种物种在表型上非常相似;因此,用传统的自动化生化方法对它们进行鉴定常常不准确。由于这些检测的数据库中缺乏生化特征,新发现或重新分类的细菌的鉴定可能存在疑问。本研究的目的是通过检测400株匈牙利临床分离的拟杆菌来确定基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)方法的准确性。通过16S rRNA基因测序证实了MALDI-TOF MS的不准确鉴定结果,并将结果与传统的自动化生化检测快速ID 32A方法进行了比较。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验