Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Kidney Int. 2018 Mar;93(3):753-760. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.06.026. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
Catheter-related infections and dysfunction are the main catheter complications causing morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis patients. However, there are no consistent data for the choice of catheter lock solutions for tunneled hemodialysis lines. In this prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, two lock regimens using three commercial catheter lock solutions were compared in 106 hemodialysis patients with a newly inserted tunneled central catheter. In the taurolidine group, TauroLock™-Hep500 was used twice per week and TauroLock™-U25,000 once a week. In the citrate group, a four percent citrate solution was used after each dialysis. Both groups were compared regarding catheter-related infections, catheter dysfunction, and costs. Over a period of 15,690 catheter days, six catheter-related infections occurred in six of 52 patients in the taurolidine group, but 18 occurred in 13 of 54 patients in the citrate group, corresponding to 0.67 and 2.7 episodes of catheter-related infections per 1000 catheter days, respectively (Incidence Rate Ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 0.63). Catheter dysfunction rates were significantly lower in the taurolidine group (18.7 vs. 44.3/1000 catheter days) and alteplase rescue significantly more frequent in the citrate group (9.8 vs. 3.8/1000 catheter days). These differences provided significant catheter-related cost savings of 43% in the taurolidine group vs. citrate group when overall expenses per patient and year were compared. Thus, use of taurolidine-based catheter lock solutions containing heparin and urokinase significantly reduced complications related to tunneled hemodialysis catheters when compared to four percent citrate solution and was overall more cost-efficient.
导管相关性感染和功能障碍是导致血液透析患者发病率和死亡率的主要导管并发症。然而,对于隧道式血液透析导管的导管锁解决方案的选择,目前尚无一致的数据。在这项前瞻性、多中心、随机、对照试验中,比较了两种使用三种商业导管锁解决方案的锁管方案,共纳入 106 例新置入隧道式中心导管的血液透析患者。在牛磺醇组中,每周两次使用 TauroLock™-Hep500,每周一次使用 TauroLock™-U25,000。在柠檬酸盐组中,每次透析后使用 4%柠檬酸盐溶液。比较两组导管相关性感染、导管功能障碍和成本。在 15690 天的导管留置期间,牛磺醇组的 52 例患者中有 6 例发生了 6 次导管相关性感染,而柠檬酸盐组的 54 例患者中有 18 例发生了 18 次导管相关性感染,相应的导管相关性感染发生率分别为每 1000 天导管留置 0.67 次和 2.7 次(发病率比 0.25,95%置信区间,0.09 至 0.63)。牛磺醇组的导管功能障碍发生率显著较低(18.7 比 44.3/1000 天导管留置),柠檬酸盐组的alteplase 抢救明显更频繁(9.8 比 3.8/1000 天导管留置)。当比较每位患者和每年的总费用时,牛磺醇组的这些差异为与柠檬酸盐组相比,在隧道式血液透析导管相关并发症方面提供了显著的 43%的导管相关成本节约。因此,与 4%柠檬酸盐溶液相比,含有肝素和尿激酶的牛磺醇基导管锁解决方案的使用显著降低了与隧道式血液透析导管相关的并发症,并且总体上更具成本效益。