Di Blasio Alberto, Di Blasio Chiara, Pedrazzi Giuseppe, Cassi Diana, Magnifico Marisabel, Manfredi Edoardo, Gandolfini Mauro
S.Bi.Bi.T. Department, University of Parma (Italy), Via Gramsci 14, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Head and Neck Department, University of Parma (Italy), Via Gramsci 14, 43126 Parma, Italy.
Oral Radiol. 2017;33(3):212-218. doi: 10.1007/s11282-017-0275-y. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
This study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of noninvasive measurement of the ANB angle using photographic and ultrasonographic methods.
Twenty consecutive orthodontic patients were evaluated. The ANB angle and soft tissue thickness covering the N, A, and B cephalometric points were measured by lateral teleradiography; these measurements were made by two expert operators. The soft tissue thickness covering the N, A, and B cephalometric points was measured by ultrasonography; these measurements were also made by two expert operators. On a 1:1 photographic profile print on which the ultrasonographic points were marked, the ANB ultrasonographic angle was measured. The following comparisons were considered: averaged and single measurements of N, A, and B points by first versus second ultrasonographer; averaged and single ultrasonographic versus radiographic soft tissue thickness covering the N, A, B points; and averaged and single ultrasonographic versus radiographic measurements of ANB angle.
High correlation and concordance of the averaged and single measurements, but no significant difference, was found between the two ultrasonographers. No statistically significant difference was found between the two methods for measuring averaged soft tissue thickness, but a 20% difference was found for the single measurements. High correlation and concordance between the ultrasonographic and radiographic measurements, but no significant difference, was found between the single and averaged ANB angle measurements.
Ultrasonography seems to be a noninvasive and reliable technique for measurement of the ANB angle and may replace radiographic measurement in some cases.
本研究旨在评估使用摄影和超声方法无创测量ANB角的可行性。
对连续20例正畸患者进行评估。通过头颅侧位X线片测量ANB角以及覆盖N、A、B头影测量点的软组织厚度;这些测量由两名专业操作人员进行。通过超声测量覆盖N、A、B头影测量点的软组织厚度;这些测量也由两名专业操作人员进行。在一张标记有超声测量点的1:1摄影侧面打印片上,测量超声ANB角。进行了以下比较:第一位与第二位超声检查者对N、A、B点的平均测量值和单次测量值;覆盖N、A、B点的超声与X线片测量的软组织平均厚度和单次厚度;以及超声与X线片测量的ANB角平均测量值和单次测量值。
两位超声检查者之间,平均测量值和单次测量值具有高度相关性和一致性,但无显著差异。两种测量平均软组织厚度的方法之间未发现统计学显著差异,但单次测量存在20%的差异。超声与X线片测量之间具有高度相关性和一致性,单次和平均ANB角测量之间无显著差异。
超声检查似乎是一种无创且可靠的测量ANB角的技术,在某些情况下可能替代X线片测量。