• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Determining geometric error model parameters of a terrestrial laser scanner through Two-face, Length-consistency, and Network methods.通过双面、长度一致性和网络方法确定地面激光扫描仪的几何误差模型参数。
Meas Sci Technol. 2017 Jun;28(6). doi: 10.1088/1361-6501/aa6929. Epub 2017 May 9.
2
Terrestrial laser scanner calibration and performance evaluation using the network method.使用网络方法进行地面激光扫描仪校准和性能评估。
Opt Lasers Eng. 2020;134. doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2020.106298.
3
Lab-built terrestrial laser scanner self-calibration using mounting angle error correction.利用安装角度误差校正的实验室构建地面激光扫描仪自校准
Opt Express. 2018 May 28;26(11):14444-14460. doi: 10.1364/OE.26.014444.
4
A Method to Evaluate Orientation-Dependent Errors in the Center of Contrast Targets Used with Terrestrial Laser Scanners.一种评估地面激光扫描仪使用的对比度目标中心方向相关误差的方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jan 16;25(2):505. doi: 10.3390/s25020505.
5
Improvised Long Test Lengths via Stitching Scale Bar Method: Performance Evaluation of Terrestrial Laser Scanners per ASTM E3125-17.通过拼接比例尺条方法实现的临时长测试长度:根据ASTM E3125-17对地面激光扫描仪的性能评估
J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol. 2020 May 28;125:125017. doi: 10.6028/jres.125.017. eCollection 2020.
6
Performance Evaluation of Terrestrial Laser Scanners - A Review.地面激光扫描仪的性能评估——综述
Meas Sci Technol. 2021;32(7). doi: 10.1088/1361-6501/abdae3.
7
Towards System Calibration of Panoramic Laser Scanners from a Single Station.基于单站的全景激光扫描仪系统校准研究
Sensors (Basel). 2017 May 17;17(5):1145. doi: 10.3390/s17051145.
8
Trimble GX200 and Riegl LMS-Z390i sensor self-calibration.天宝GX200和瑞格LMS-Z390i传感器的自校准
Opt Express. 2011 Jan 31;19(3):2676-93. doi: 10.1364/OE.19.002676.
9
Improvements to and comparison of static terrestrial LiDAR self-calibration methods.静态地面 LiDAR 自标定方法的改进与比较。
Sensors (Basel). 2013 May 31;13(6):7224-49. doi: 10.3390/s130607224.
10
[Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].[氯化乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验标准技术规范(2023年)]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 12;47(2):101-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20231019-00247.

引用本文的文献

1
A Method to Calibrate Angular Positioning Errors Using a Laser Tracker and a Plane Mirror.一种使用激光跟踪仪和平板镜校准角定位误差的方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Mar 15;25(6):1834. doi: 10.3390/s25061834.
2
A Method to Evaluate Orientation-Dependent Errors in the Center of Contrast Targets Used with Terrestrial Laser Scanners.一种评估地面激光扫描仪使用的对比度目标中心方向相关误差的方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jan 16;25(2):505. doi: 10.3390/s25020505.
3
Validation of the network method for evaluating uncertainty and improvement of geometry error parameters of a laser tracker.用于评估激光跟踪仪不确定性及改进几何误差参数的网络方法的验证
Precis Eng. 2021 Nov;72. doi: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2021.07.005.
4
Performance Evaluation of Terrestrial Laser Scanners - A Review.地面激光扫描仪的性能评估——综述
Meas Sci Technol. 2021;32(7). doi: 10.1088/1361-6501/abdae3.
5
Terrestrial laser scanner calibration and performance evaluation using the network method.使用网络方法进行地面激光扫描仪校准和性能评估。
Opt Lasers Eng. 2020;134. doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2020.106298.
6
An Overview of Activities at NIST Towards the Proposed ASTM E57 3D Imaging System Point-to-point Distance Standard.美国国家标准与技术研究院针对拟议的ASTM E57 3D成像系统点对点距离标准开展的活动概述。
J CMSC. 2017;12(2):1-14.

本文引用的文献

1
Improvements to and comparison of static terrestrial LiDAR self-calibration methods.静态地面 LiDAR 自标定方法的改进与比较。
Sensors (Basel). 2013 May 31;13(6):7224-49. doi: 10.3390/s130607224.
2
Trimble GX200 and Riegl LMS-Z390i sensor self-calibration.天宝GX200和瑞格LMS-Z390i传感器的自校准
Opt Express. 2011 Jan 31;19(3):2676-93. doi: 10.1364/OE.19.002676.

通过双面、长度一致性和网络方法确定地面激光扫描仪的几何误差模型参数。

Determining geometric error model parameters of a terrestrial laser scanner through Two-face, Length-consistency, and Network methods.

作者信息

Wang Ling, Muralikrishnan Bala, Rachakonda Prem, Sawyer Daniel

机构信息

Department of Automation, School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, 310018, P. R. China.

Engineering Physics Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg MD 20899, USA.

出版信息

Meas Sci Technol. 2017 Jun;28(6). doi: 10.1088/1361-6501/aa6929. Epub 2017 May 9.

DOI:10.1088/1361-6501/aa6929
PMID:28890607
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5587141/
Abstract

Terrestrial laser scanners (TLS) are increasingly used in large-scale manufacturing and assembly where required measurement uncertainties are on the order of few tenths of a millimeter or smaller. In order to meet these stringent requirements, systematic errors within a TLS are compensated in-situ through self-calibration. In the Network method of self-calibration, numerous targets distributed in the work-volume are measured from multiple locations with the TLS to determine parameters of the TLS error model. In this paper, we propose two new self-calibration methods, the Two-face method and the Length-consistency method. The Length-consistency method is proposed as a more efficient way of realizing the Network method where the length between any pair of targets from multiple TLS positions are compared to determine TLS model parameters. The Two-face method is a two-step process. In the first step, many model parameters are determined directly from the difference between front-face and back-face measurements of targets distributed in the work volume. In the second step, all remaining model parameters are determined through the Length-consistency method. We compare the Two-face method, the Length-consistency method, and the Network method in terms of the uncertainties in the model parameters, and demonstrate the validity of our techniques using a calibrated scale bar and front-face back-face target measurements. The clear advantage of these self-calibration methods is that a reference instrument or calibrated artifacts are not required, thus significantly lowering the cost involved in the calibration process.

摘要

地面激光扫描仪(TLS)越来越多地应用于大规模制造和装配中,这些领域要求的测量不确定度在十分之几毫米或更小的量级。为了满足这些严格要求,TLS内部的系统误差通过自校准进行现场补偿。在自校准的网络方法中,在工作空间中分布的大量靶标从多个位置用TLS进行测量,以确定TLS误差模型的参数。在本文中,我们提出了两种新的自校准方法,即双面法和长度一致性法。长度一致性法是作为实现网络方法的一种更有效方式而提出的,其中比较来自多个TLS位置的任意一对靶标之间的长度以确定TLS模型参数。双面法是一个两步过程。第一步,许多模型参数直接从工作空间中分布的靶标的正面和背面测量值之间的差异确定。第二步,所有剩余的模型参数通过长度一致性法确定。我们在模型参数的不确定度方面比较了双面法、长度一致性法和网络方法,并使用校准的比例尺和正面-背面靶标测量值证明了我们技术的有效性。这些自校准方法的明显优点是不需要参考仪器或校准工件,从而显著降低了校准过程中的成本。