• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2型与1型心肌梗死:临床特征与结局的比较及观察性研究的荟萃分析

Type 2 versus type 1 myocardial infarction: a comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes with a meta-analysis of observational studies.

作者信息

Gupta Sonu, Vaidya Satyanarayana R, Arora Sameer, Bahekar Amol, Devarapally Santhosh R

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Cape Fear Valley Medical Center, Fayetteville, NC, USA.

Division of Cardiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017 Aug;7(4):348-358. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.03.21.

DOI:10.21037/cdt.2017.03.21
PMID:28890871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5582063/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Type 2 myocardial infarction (MI) is an imbalance between myocardial oxygen demand and supply, leading to myocardial ischemia. It is not due to plaque rupture, and is usually caused by a condition other than coronary artery disease (CAD). However, limited data are available comparing the prevalence of traditional coronary risk factors and mortality between type 1 and type 2 MI. We hypothesize that type 2 MI carries a higher mortality than type 1.

METHODS

We searched the databases of PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and MEDLINE for studies comparing type 1 MI with type 2 MI. The baseline variables were compared in each cohort. Summary risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the random effects model to compare mortality between the two groups.

RESULTS

The included studies yielded 25,872 patients of whom 2,683 (10%) had type 2 MI. Compared to the type 1 cohort, the type 2 cohort had significantly higher inpatient (15% 4.7%, P<0.00001), 30-day (17.6% 5.3%, P<0.00001) and 1-yr mortality (27% 13%, P<0.00001), as well as higher 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (20% 9%, P<0.0001). Operative stress (20%) was the most common trigger of type 2 MI, followed by sepsis (19%), arrhythmia (18.63%), heart failure (15%), and anemia (12%).

CONCLUSIONS

Type 2 MI is a common entity and is more common in females, older age groups, and in patients with multiple comorbidities: it also tends to result in higher mortality.

摘要

背景

2型心肌梗死(MI)是心肌氧需求与供应之间的失衡,导致心肌缺血。它并非由斑块破裂引起,通常由冠状动脉疾病(CAD)以外的疾病导致。然而,关于1型和2型MI之间传统冠状动脉危险因素的患病率及死亡率比较的数据有限。我们假设2型MI的死亡率高于1型。

方法

我们检索了PubMed、EMBASE、CENTRAL和MEDLINE数据库,以查找比较1型MI和2型MI的研究。对每个队列的基线变量进行比较。使用随机效应模型计算汇总风险比和95%置信区间,以比较两组之间的死亡率。

结果

纳入的研究共涉及25872例患者,其中2683例(10%)为2型MI。与1型队列相比,2型队列的住院死亡率(15%对4.7%,P<0.00001)、30天死亡率(17.6%对5.3%,P<0.00001)和1年死亡率(27%对13%,P<0.00001)均显著更高,30天主要不良心血管事件发生率也更高(20%对9%,P<0.0001)。手术应激(20%)是2型MI最常见的诱因,其次是脓毒症(19%)、心律失常(18.63%)、心力衰竭(15%)和贫血(12%)。

结论

2型MI是一种常见病症,在女性、老年人群以及患有多种合并症的患者中更为常见,其死亡率也往往更高。

相似文献

1
Type 2 versus type 1 myocardial infarction: a comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes with a meta-analysis of observational studies.2型与1型心肌梗死:临床特征与结局的比较及观察性研究的荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017 Aug;7(4):348-358. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.03.21.
2
Incident Type 2 Myocardial Infarction in a Cohort of Patients Undergoing Coronary or Peripheral Arterial Angiography.在接受冠状动脉或外周动脉血管造影术的患者队列中发生 2 型心肌梗死事件。
Circulation. 2017 Jan 10;135(2):116-127. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023052. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
3
Type-II myocardial infarction--patient characteristics, management and outcomes.II型心肌梗死——患者特征、管理及结局
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 2;9(1):e84285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084285. eCollection 2014.
4
Cardiovascular outcomes among elderly patients with heart failure and coronary artery disease and without atrial fibrillation: a retrospective cohort study.老年心力衰竭合并冠心病且无房颤患者的心血管结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Jan 15;19(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0991-1.
5
Mortality of Myocardial Infarction by Sex, Age, and Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Status in the ACTION Registry-GWTG (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With the Guidelines).在ACTION注册研究-GWTG(急性冠状动脉治疗与干预结果网络注册研究-遵循指南)中,按性别、年龄和阻塞性冠状动脉疾病状态划分的心肌梗死死亡率
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Dec;10(12):e003443. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003443.
6
Clinical features and outcomes of patients with type 2 myocardial infarction: Insights from the Thrombin Receptor Antagonist for Clinical Event Reduction in Acute Coronary Syndrome (TRACER) trial.2 型心肌梗死患者的临床特征和结局:来自急性冠脉综合征中凝血酶受体拮抗剂用于临床事件减少(TRACER)试验的研究结果。
Am Heart J. 2018 Feb;196:28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.10.007. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
7
Provoking conditions, management and outcomes of type 2 myocardial infarction and myocardial necrosis.2型心肌梗死和心肌坏死的诱发因素、管理及结局
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Sep 1;218:196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.05.045. Epub 2016 May 13.
8
Outcomes with type 2 myocardial infarction compared with non-ischaemic myocardial injury.2型心肌梗死与非缺血性心肌损伤的预后比较。
Heart. 2017 Apr;103(8):616-622. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310243. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
9
Ischemic Heart Disease in Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease.终末期肾病患者的缺血性心脏病
Blood Purif. 2015;40(4):332-6. doi: 10.1159/000441582. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
10
Differential Rates and Clinical Significance of Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction After Stenting or Bypass Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Disease According to Various Definitions.根据不同定义,多支冠状动脉疾病支架或旁路手术后围手术期心肌梗死的不同发生率和临床意义。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Aug 14;10(15):1498-1507. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.05.051.

引用本文的文献

1
Type 2 MI a legitimate efficacy endpoint in cardiovascular trials? A critical appraisal.2型心肌梗死在心血管试验中是一个合理的疗效终点吗?一项批判性评估。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jun 19;12:1564432. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1564432. eCollection 2025.
2
Management and Outcomes of Type I and Type II Myocardial Infarction in Cardiogenic Shock.心源性休克中I型和II型心肌梗死的管理与预后
CJC Open. 2023 Oct 16;6(2Part A):122-132. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.10.011. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Association between kidney function, frailty and receipt of invasive management after acute coronary syndrome.肾功能、衰弱与急性冠状动脉综合征后接受有创性治疗的关系。
Open Heart. 2024 Oct 9;11(2):e002875. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-002875.
4
Clinical Characteristics, Outcomes, and Epidemiological Trends of Patients Admitted With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction.2型心肌梗死患者的临床特征、结局及流行病学趋势
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Jun 29;1(5):100395. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100395. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.
5
In-Hospital Versus Out-Of-Hospital Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI).院内与院外非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2024 Jun 14;121(12):409-410. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0032.
6
[Acute ischemic stroke and troponin elevation: update of the Mannheim clinical algorithm].[急性缺血性卒中与肌钙蛋白升高:曼海姆临床算法的更新]
Inn Med (Heidelb). 2024 Aug;65(8):830-839. doi: 10.1007/s00108-024-01719-x. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
7
Prevalence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Type 2 NSTEMI in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19.COVID-19 住院患者 2 型 NSTEMI 的患病率、预测因素和结局。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 May 21;13(10):e032572. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032572. Epub 2024 May 10.
8
Comparison between In-Hospital and Out-of-Hospital Acute Myocardial Infarctions: Results from the Regional Myocardial Infarction Registry of Saxony-Anhalt (RHESA) Study.院内与院外急性心肌梗死的比较:来自萨克森-安哈尔特州区域性心肌梗死登记研究(RHESA)的结果
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 29;12(19):6305. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196305.
9
Occult myocardial injury is prevalent amongst elderly patients in the hospital-at-home setting. A retrospective analysis of 213 patients.隐匿性心肌损伤在居家住院的老年患者中很普遍。对213例患者进行的回顾性分析。
Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2023 Sep 23;19:200215. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2023.200215. eCollection 2023 Dec.
10
Outcomes of Patients With Takotsubo Syndrome Compared With Type 1 and Type 2 Myocardial Infarction.Takotsubo 综合征患者与 1 型和 2 型心肌梗死患者的结局比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Sep 19;12(18):e030114. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030114. Epub 2023 Sep 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Discordance between ICD-Coded Myocardial Infarction and Diagnosis according to the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction.国际疾病分类(ICD)编码的心肌梗死与依据心肌梗死通用定义所做诊断之间的不一致性。
Clin Chem. 2017 Jan;63(1):415-419. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.263764. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
2
Troponin-I Level After Major Noncardiac Surgery and Its Association With Long-Term Mortality.非心脏大手术后肌钙蛋白I水平及其与长期死亡率的关联。
Int Heart J. 2016 May 25;57(3):278-84. doi: 10.1536/ihj.15-352. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
3
Comparison between type-2 and type-1 myocardial infarction: clinical features, treatment strategies and outcomes.2 型和 1 型心肌梗死的比较:临床特征、治疗策略和结局。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2016 Jan;13(1):15-22. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2016.01.014.
4
Type 2 myocardial infarction: A descriptive analysis and comparison with type 1 myocardial infarction.2型心肌梗死:一项描述性分析及与1型心肌梗死的比较
J Cardiol. 2016 Jan;67(1):51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2015.04.001. Epub 2015 May 5.
5
Third universal definition of myocardial infarction.心肌梗死的第三次全球定义。
Glob Heart. 2012 Dec;7(4):275-95. doi: 10.1016/j.gheart.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
6
Sensitive troponin assay and the classification of myocardial infarction.肌钙蛋白敏感检测与心肌梗死的分类
Am J Med. 2015 May;128(5):493-501.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.10.056. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
7
Type 2 myocardial infarction in clinical practice.临床实践中的 2 型心肌梗死。
Heart. 2015 Jan;101(2):101-6. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306093. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
8
Type 2 myocardial infarction: the next frontier.2型心肌梗死:新的前沿领域。
Am J Med. 2014 Jun;127(6):e19. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.02.027.
9
Diagnostic and therapeutic implications of type 2 myocardial infarction: review and commentary.2 型心肌梗死的诊断和治疗意义:综述与评论。
Am J Med. 2014 Feb;127(2):105-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.09.031. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
10
Mortality rate in type 2 myocardial infarction: observations from an unselected hospital cohort.2 型心肌梗死的死亡率:一项未选择医院队列的观察性研究。
Am J Med. 2014 Apr;127(4):295-302. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.12.020. Epub 2014 Jan 21.