Hillebrand Mathias, Koschyk Dietmar, Ter Hark Pia, Schüler Helke, Rybczynski Meike, Berger Jürgen, Gulati Amit, Bernhardt Alexander M, Detter Christian, Girdauskas Evaldas, Blankenberg Stefan, von Kodolitsch Yskert
Centre of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017 Aug;7(4):367-379. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.05.03.
Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the standard procedure to distinguish tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) from bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). Published studies assessed the accuracy of TTE for BAV under ideal conditions. Conversely, we aimed at assessing accuracy of TTE for BAV under routine conditions.
This retrospective, cross-sectional study of 216 adults included 132 men aged 62±14 years. Of these, 108 had BAV and 108 were age-matched individuals with TAV. All diagnoses were confirmed at surgery. We assessed TTE in two patient groups. First, in the (I) group of all 216 individuals, where we assessed accuracy for BAV according to the original diagnoses as documented by the primary investigators during original TTE examination. Second, we assessed accuracy for BAV according to expert re-evaluation in (II) all 158 TTE with availability of original recordings. Third, we performed a meta-analysis of published results on the accuracy of TTE for BAV according to PRISMA standards.
Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of (I) primary investigators was 46.3%, 97.2, and 71.8% as compared to (II) expert re-evaluation with 59.7%, 93%, and 77.8%, respectively. Sensitivity was significantly higher at re-evaluation (P<0.001). TTE at a non-tertiary care center (P=0.012), presence of aortic aneurysm (P=0.001) and presence of severe aortic valve calcification (P=0.003) predicted an inaccurate diagnosis of BAV. Conversely, meta-analysis of published TTE studies identified a pooled sensitivity of 87.7% and a pooled specificity of 88.3% for BAV.
The current study shows that TTE yields almost ideal diagnostic accuracy when ideal investigators examine ideal patients. However, the study also shows that TTE yields suboptimal diagnostic accuracy under routine conditions. TTE in non-tertiary care settings, concomitant aortic aneurysm, and presence of severe aortic valve calcification predict an inaccurate diagnosis of BAV.
经胸超声心动图(TTE)是区分三尖瓣主动脉瓣(TAV)和二叶式主动脉瓣(BAV)的标准检查方法。已发表的研究评估了在理想条件下TTE对BAV的诊断准确性。相反,我们旨在评估常规条件下TTE对BAV的诊断准确性。
这项针对216名成年人的回顾性横断面研究包括132名年龄在62±14岁的男性。其中,108人患有BAV,108名年龄匹配的个体患有TAV。所有诊断均在手术中得到证实。我们在两个患者组中评估了TTE。首先,在所有216名个体的(I)组中,我们根据主要研究者在原始TTE检查期间记录的原始诊断评估BAV的诊断准确性。其次,我们在(II)所有可获得原始记录的158次TTE中根据专家重新评估评估BAV的诊断准确性。第三,我们根据PRISMA标准对已发表的关于TTE对BAV诊断准确性的结果进行了荟萃分析。
与(II)专家重新评估相比,(I)主要研究者的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为46.3%、97.2%和71.8%,专家重新评估的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为59.7%、93%和77.8%。重新评估时的敏感性显著更高(P<0.001)。非三级医疗中心的TTE(P=0.012)、主动脉瘤的存在(P=0.001)和严重主动脉瓣钙化的存在(P=0.003)预示着BAV的诊断不准确。相反,已发表的TTE研究的荟萃分析确定BAV的汇总敏感性为87.7%,汇总特异性为88.3%。
当前研究表明,当理想的研究者检查理想的患者时,TTE可产生几乎理想的诊断准确性。然而,该研究还表明,在常规条件下TTE的诊断准确性欠佳。非三级医疗环境中的TTE、合并主动脉瘤以及严重主动脉瓣钙化的存在预示着BAV的诊断不准确。