Corrao Giovanni, Monzio Compagnoni Matteo, Rea Federico, Merlino Luca, Catapano Alberico L, Mancia Giuseppe
Interuniversity Centre of Healthcare Research & Pharmacoepidemiology, Laboratory of Healthcare Research & Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, Division of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Interuniversity Centre of Healthcare Research & Pharmacoepidemiology, Laboratory of Healthcare Research & Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, Division of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Nov;133:60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
To provide information on the extent to which type 2 diabetes more likely induced by statins affects the risk of macrovascular complications compared to diabetes unlikely induced by statins.
The 84,828 residents in the Italian Lombardy Region who were newly treated with statins between 2003 and 2005 were followed from the index statin prescription until 2009 (step-1 follow-up) to identify those starting antidiabetic therapy. The proportion of days of follow-up covered by statins measured adherence with statins. Cohort members who experienced diabetes were 1:3 matched with those who did not developed diabetes for gender, age and previous adherence with statin treatment. The 3321 diabetic - non-diabetic sets, were followed from the initial antidiabetic therapy until 2012 (step-2 follow-up) to estimate the hazard ratio (HR), and 95% Confidence Interval (CI), for macrovascular complications (proportional hazard models) associated with diabetes separately in each category of adherence with statins.
During the step-1 follow-up, the risk of new-onset diabetes increased progressively with increasing adherence with statins. During the step-2 follow-up, the risk of macrovascular complications associated with diabetes decreased progressively from 1.70 (1.18-2.44), 1.41 (1.17-1.70), 1.30 (1.07-1.57) until 1.10 (0.40-2.80) as adherence with statins during the step-1 follow-up increased.
Type 2 diabetes lost its association with increasing macrovascular risk when previous adherence with statins was very high, and thus the chance of its induction by the drug greater. Statin-dependent type 2 diabetes might be prognostically less adverse than diabetes unlikely induced by statins.
提供信息,以说明与不太可能由他汀类药物诱发的糖尿病相比,更可能由他汀类药物诱发的2型糖尿病在多大程度上影响大血管并发症风险。
对2003年至2005年间在意大利伦巴第地区新接受他汀类药物治疗的84828名居民进行随访,从他汀类药物首次处方开始直至2009年(第一步随访),以确定开始接受抗糖尿病治疗的患者。用他汀类药物治疗的天数比例衡量他汀类药物的依从性。将发生糖尿病的队列成员与未患糖尿病的成员按性别、年龄和先前他汀类药物治疗的依从性进行1:3匹配。对3321组糖尿病-非糖尿病患者从初始抗糖尿病治疗开始直至2012年进行随访(第二步随访),以估计与糖尿病相关的大血管并发症的风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI),分别针对每种他汀类药物依从性类别进行分析(比例风险模型)。
在第一步随访期间,新发糖尿病的风险随着他汀类药物依从性的增加而逐渐升高。在第二步随访期间,随着第一步随访期间他汀类药物依从性的增加,与糖尿病相关的大血管并发症风险从1.70(1.18 - 2.44)、1.41(1.17 - 1.70)、1.30(1.07 - 1.57)逐渐降至1.10(0.40 - 2.80)。
当先前他汀类药物依从性非常高时,2型糖尿病与大血管风险增加之间的关联消失,因此药物诱发2型糖尿病的可能性更大。他汀类药物依赖型2型糖尿病在预后方面可能不如不太可能由他汀类药物诱发的糖尿病严重。