Safety and Feasibility of a Laparoscopy-Assisted Non-Anatomic Resection Technique for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Located at Right Posterior Segments in Cirrhotic Patients: A Case-Controlled Study with Propensity Score Matching.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted resection for right posterior segment (LAR-RPS) with open resection (OR-RPS) performed by experienced hepatobiliary surgeons.

METHODS

This was a prospective comparative nonrandomized study.

RESULTS

The groups were comparable in terms of baseline demographics and clinicopathological data. Reduced operative time (254.88 ± 78.56 vs. 347.95 ± 82.56 min; p = 0.04) and estimated blood loss (477 ± 756 vs. 712 ± 836 mL; p = 0.03) were observed in LAR-RPS. Also, significant less duration of hospital stay (7.53 ± 2.68 vs. 12.57 ± 3.21 days; p < 0.001) was associated with LAR-RPS compared to OR-RPS. Long-term oncologic outcomes were comparable in 2 groups, in terms of both the overall and disease-free survival rates (p = 0.450 and 0.463, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that laparoscopic-assisted resection is a safe and effective operative procedure in those cirrhotic patients with a lesion in the right posterior section of the liver. When compared to the open approach, the laparoscopic-assisted approach reduces operative time and blood loss, as well as the length of hospital stay.