Stiehl Emily, Shivaprakash Namrata, Thatcher Esther, Ornelas India J, Kneipp Shawn, Baron Sherry L, Muramatsu Naoko
1 Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
2 Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Am J Health Promot. 2018 Feb;32(2):359-373. doi: 10.1177/0890117117728607. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
To determine: (1) What research has been done on health promotion interventions for low-wage workers and (2) what factors are associated with effective low-wage workers' health promotion programs.
This review includes articles from PubMed and PsychINFO published in or before July 2016. Study Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria: The search yielded 130 unique articles, 35 met the inclusion criteria: (1) being conducted in the United States, (2) including an intervention or empirical data around health promotion among adult low-wage workers, and (3) measuring changes in low-wage worker health.
Central features of the selected studies were extracted, including the theoretical foundation; study design; health promotion intervention content and delivery format; intervention-targeted outcomes; sample characteristics; and work, occupational, and industry characteristics.
Consistent with a scoping review, we used a descriptive, content analysis approach to analyze extracted data. All authors agreed upon emergent themes and 2 authors independently coded data extracted from each article.
The results suggest that the research on low-wage workers' health promotion is limited, but increasing, and that low-wage workers have limited access to and utilization of worksite health promotion programs.
Workplace health promotion programs could have a positive effect on low-wage workers, but more work is needed to understand how to expand access, what drives participation, and which delivery mechanisms are most effective.
确定:(1)针对低薪工人的健康促进干预措施已有哪些研究,以及(2)哪些因素与有效的低薪工人健康促进项目相关。
本综述纳入了2016年7月及以前发表于PubMed和PsychINFO的文章。研究纳入/排除标准:检索得到130篇独特的文章,35篇符合纳入标准:(1)在美国开展,(2)包含围绕成年低薪工人健康促进的干预措施或实证数据,以及(3)测量低薪工人健康状况的变化。
提取所选研究的核心特征,包括理论基础、研究设计、健康促进干预措施的内容和实施形式、干预目标结果、样本特征以及工作、职业和行业特征。
与范围综述一致,我们采用描述性内容分析方法来分析提取的数据。所有作者就出现的主题达成一致,两位作者独立对从每篇文章中提取的数据进行编码。
结果表明,关于低薪工人健康促进的研究有限,但在增加,而且低薪工人获得和利用工作场所健康促进项目的机会有限。
工作场所健康促进项目可能对低薪工人产生积极影响,但需要开展更多工作来了解如何扩大获取途径、推动参与的因素以及哪种实施机制最有效。