Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Research, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Nov;26(11):2029-2037. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.06.036. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
Larger glenosphere diameters have been used recently to increase prosthesis stability and impingement-free range of motion in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. The goal of this study was to evaluate the rate of polyethylene wear for 32-mm and 40-mm glenospheres.
Glenospheres (32 mm and 40 mm, n = 6/group) and conventional polyethylene humeral liners underwent a 5-million cycle (MC) wear simulation protocol. Abduction-adduction and flexion-extension motion profiles were alternated every 250,000 cycles. At each interval, mass loss was determined and converted to volume loss and wear rate. At 0, 2.5 MC, and 5 MC, liners were imaged using micro-computed tomography to determine surface deviation. White light interferometry was performed on liners and glenospheres at 0 and 5 MC to quantify surface roughness. Wear particle morphology was characterized by environmental scanning electron microscopy.
Total volume loss was significantly higher in 40-mm liners from 1.5 MC onward (P < .05). Overall, volumetric wear rate was significantly higher in 40-mm liners compared with 32-mm glenospheres (81.7 ± 23.9 mm/MC vs. 68.0 ± 18.9 mm/MC; P < .001). However, micro-computed tomography surface deviation results demonstrated increased linear penetration on 32-mm glenospheres compared with 40-mm glenospheres (0.36 ± 0.03 µm vs. 0.28 ± 0.01 µm; P = .002). Surface roughness measurements showed no difference for liners; however, increased roughness was noted for 40-mm glenospheres at 5 MC compared with 32 mm (P < .05).
Larger glenospheres underwent significantly greater polyethylene volume loss and volumetric wear rates, whereas smaller glenospheres underwent greater polyethylene surface deviations. The enhanced stability provided by larger glenospheres must be weighed against the potential for increased polyethylene wear.
最近,更大的臼杯直径被用于增加反式全肩关节置换术后假体的稳定性和无撞击活动范围。本研究的目的是评估 32 毫米和 40 毫米臼杯的聚乙烯磨损率。
将臼杯(32 毫米和 40 毫米,每组 n=6)和传统聚乙烯肱骨头衬垫进行 500 万次循环(MC)磨损模拟试验。每次 25 万次循环交替进行外展-内收和屈伸运动。在每个时间点,测定质量损失并转换为体积损失和磨损率。在 0、2.5 MC 和 5 MC 时,用微计算机断层扫描对衬垫进行成像,以确定表面偏差。在 0 和 5 MC 时,对衬垫和臼杯进行白光干涉测量,以量化表面粗糙度。用环境扫描电子显微镜对磨屑形态进行了表征。
从 1.5 MC 开始,40 毫米衬垫的总体积损失明显更高(P<.05)。总体而言,40 毫米衬垫的容积磨损率明显高于 32 毫米臼杯(81.7±23.9mm/MC 比 68.0±18.9mm/MC;P<.001)。然而,微计算机断层扫描表面偏差结果表明,与 40 毫米臼杯相比,32 毫米臼杯的线性穿透增加(0.36±0.03 µm 比 0.28±0.01 µm;P=0.002)。衬垫的表面粗糙度测量没有差异;然而,与 32 毫米相比,40 毫米臼杯在 5 MC 时的粗糙度增加(P<.05)。
更大的臼杯经历了明显更大的聚乙烯体积损失和容积磨损率,而较小的臼杯经历了更大的聚乙烯表面偏差。更大臼杯提供的增强稳定性必须与潜在的更高聚乙烯磨损率相权衡。