García-Sancho Javier, Sánchez Ana, Vega Aurelio, Noriega David C, Nocito Mercedes
Institute for Molecular Biology and Genetics (IBGM), University of Valladolid and Spanish National Council (CSIC), Valladolid, Spain.
Division of Traumatology, Valladolid University Clinic Hospital, Valladolid, Spain.
Transplant Direct. 2017 Aug 17;3(9):e205. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000724. eCollection 2017 Sep.
The necessity for more effective therapies for chronic osteoarticular diseases has led to the development of treatments based on mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), the natural precursors of musculoskeletal tissue. Treatments with autologous MSCs yielded excellent results, with nearly 70% improvement of pain and disability in osteoarthritis and degenerative disc disease. Using allogeneic MSCs is logistically more convenient and would widen the pool of eligible patients, but potential immune rejection should be considered. In this context, MSCs are purportedly immune evasive and better tolerated than other cell types.
We used samples collected during the performance of 2 randomized clinical trials using allogeneic bone marrow MSCs for treatment of osteoarthritis (NCT01586312) and degenerative disc disease (NCT01860417). Serum samples were used to determine anti-HLA antibodies, whereas either blood or MSC samples were used for HLA typing of recipients and donors, respectively. Algofunctional indexes were used as indicators of clinical evolution, and the correlation between the number of donor-host HLA mismatches and the efficacy of treatment was determined.
Immune response was weak and transient, with reactivity decaying during the first year. Consistently, better donor-recipient HLA matching did not enhance efficacy.
This lack of reactivity is presumably due to the cooperation of 2 factors, (1) downregulation of the host immune responses by the transplanted MSCs and (2) effective insulation of these cells inside the articular cavity or the intervertebral disc, respectively. Interestingly, better HLA matching did not enhance efficacy. These observations have medical relevance as they support the clinical use of allogeneic cells, at least as a single-dose administration. Multiple-dose applications will require further research to exclude possible sensitization.
慢性骨关节疾病对更有效治疗方法的需求促使了基于间充质干细胞(MSCs)的治疗方法的发展,间充质干细胞是肌肉骨骼组织的天然前体细胞。自体间充质干细胞治疗取得了优异的效果,骨关节炎和椎间盘退变疾病患者的疼痛和功能障碍改善率近70%。使用异体间充质干细胞在后勤保障方面更便捷,并且能扩大符合条件的患者群体,但应考虑潜在的免疫排斥反应。在此背景下,据称间充质干细胞具有免疫逃逸能力,且比其他细胞类型耐受性更好。
我们使用了在两项随机临床试验中收集的样本,这两项试验使用异体骨髓间充质干细胞治疗骨关节炎(NCT01586312)和椎间盘退变疾病(NCT01860417)。血清样本用于检测抗HLA抗体,而血液样本和间充质干细胞样本分别用于受体和供体的HLA分型。使用算法功能指标作为临床进展的指标,并确定供体 - 宿主HLA错配数量与治疗效果之间的相关性。
免疫反应微弱且短暂,反应性在第一年逐渐衰减。同样,供体 - 受体HLA匹配度更高并未提高疗效。
这种缺乏反应性可能是由于两个因素的共同作用,(1)移植的间充质干细胞下调宿主免疫反应,(2)这些细胞分别在关节腔或椎间盘内有效隔离。有趣的是,更好的HLA匹配并未提高疗效。这些观察结果具有医学相关性,因为它们支持异体细胞的临床应用,至少作为单剂量给药。多次给药应用将需要进一步研究以排除可能的致敏作用。