Suppr超能文献

[糖尿病患者的共同决策]

[Shared decision making in patients with diabetes mellitus].

作者信息

Serrano Valentina, Larrea-Mantilla Laura, Rodríguez-Gutiérrez René, Spencer-Bonilla Gabriela, Málaga Germán, Hargraves Ian, Montori Víctor M

机构信息

Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Minnesota, USA.

Unidad de Conocimiento y Evidencia, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Perú.

出版信息

Rev Med Chil. 2017 May;145(5):641-649. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872017000500012.

Abstract

Patients with diabetes mellitus often have several medical problems and carry a burden imposed by their illness and treatment. Health care often ignores the values, preferences and context of patients, leading to treatments that do not fit into patients’ overwhelmed lives. Shared Decision Making (SDM) emerges as a way to answer the question: “What’s best for the patient?”. SDM promotes an empathic conversation between patients and clinicians that integrates the best evidence available with their values, preferences and context. We discuss three SDM approaches for patients with diabetes: one focused on sharing information, another on making choices, and a third one on helping patients and clinicians to talk about how to address the problems of living with diabetes and its comorbidities. Despite the benefits demonstrated in studies conducted in the U.S. and Europe, the implementation of SDM continues to be a challenge. In Latin America, healthcare and socio-economic conditions render the implementation of SDM more challenging. Research aimed to respond to this challenge is necessary. Meanwhile, clinicians can practice SDM by sharing evidence-based information, giving voice to patients’ values and preferences in making choices, and creating empathic conversations aimed at decisions aligned with patients’ context, dreams, goals, and life expectations.

摘要

糖尿病患者常常伴有多种医疗问题,并承受着疾病和治疗带来的负担。医疗保健往往忽视患者的价值观、偏好和背景情况,导致治疗方案与患者不堪重负的生活不相适应。共同决策(SDM)应运而生,旨在回答“什么对患者最有利?”这一问题。共同决策促进患者与临床医生之间进行共情对话,将最佳现有证据与他们的价值观、偏好和背景情况相结合。我们讨论了针对糖尿病患者的三种共同决策方法:一种侧重于信息共享,另一种侧重于做出选择,第三种则侧重于帮助患者和临床医生探讨如何应对糖尿病及其合并症带来的生活问题。尽管在美国和欧洲开展的研究已证明了其益处,但共同决策的实施仍然是一项挑战。在拉丁美洲,医疗保健和社会经济状况使共同决策的实施更具挑战性。开展旨在应对这一挑战的研究很有必要。与此同时,临床医生可以通过分享循证信息、在决策过程中体现患者的价值观和偏好,以及开展旨在做出符合患者背景、梦想、目标和生活期望的决策的共情对话来践行共同决策。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验