Archer Brett N, Hallahan Cathie, Stanley Priscilla, Seward Kathy, Lesjak Margaret, Hope Kirsty, Brown Anthony
Public Health Training Program, NSW Ministry of Health, Sydney, New South Wales.
Population Health, Far West and Western NSW Local Health Districts, Broken Hill, Bathurst and Dubbo, New South Wales.
Commun Dis Intell Q Rep. 2017 Jun 30;41(2):E125-E133. doi: 10.33321/cdi.2017.41.17.
We investigated an outbreak of Q fever in a remote rural town in New South Wales, Australia. Cases identified through active and passive case finding activities, and retrospective laboratory record review were interviewed using a standard questionnaire. Two sets of case-case analyses were completed to generate hypotheses regarding clinical, epidemiological and exposure risk factors associated with infection during the outbreak. Laboratory-confirmed outbreak cases (n=14) were compared with an excluded case group (n=16) and a group of historic Q fever cases from the region (n=106). In comparison with the historic case group, outbreak cases were significantly more likely to be female (43% vs. 18% males, P = 0.04) and identify as Aboriginal (29% vs. 7% non-Aboriginal, P = 0.03). Similarly, very few cases worked in high-risk occupations (21% vs. 84%, P < 0.01). Most outbreak cases (64%) reported no high-risk exposure activities in the month prior to onset. In comparison with the excluded case group, a significantly increased proportion of outbreak cases had contact with dogs (100% vs. 63%, P = 0.02) or sighted kangaroos on their residential property (100% vs. 60%, P = 0.02). High rates of tick exposure (92%) were also reported, although this was not significantly different from the excluded case group. While a source of this outbreak could not be confirmed, our findings suggest infections likely occurred via inhalation of aerosols or dust contaminated by Coxiella burnetii, dispersed through the town from either an unidentified animal facility or from excreta of native wildlife or feral animals. Alternatively transmission may have occurred via companion animals or tick vectors.
我们对澳大利亚新南威尔士州一个偏远乡村小镇的Q热疫情进行了调查。通过主动和被动病例发现活动以及回顾性实验室记录审查确定的病例,使用标准问卷进行了访谈。完成了两组病例对照分析,以生成关于疫情期间与感染相关的临床、流行病学和暴露风险因素的假设。将实验室确诊的疫情病例(n = 14)与排除病例组(n = 16)以及该地区的一组历史Q热病例(n = 106)进行了比较。与历史病例组相比,疫情病例中女性比例显著更高(43%对18%为男性,P = 0.04),且原住民比例更高(29%对7%为非原住民,P = 0.03)。同样,从事高风险职业的病例极少(21%对84%,P < 0.01)。大多数疫情病例(64%)报告在发病前一个月没有高风险暴露活动。与排除病例组相比,疫情病例中与狗接触的比例显著增加(100%对63%,P = 0.02),或者在其居住场所看到袋鼠的比例也显著增加(100%对60%,P = 0.02)。蜱暴露率也很高(92%),尽管与排除病例组相比无显著差异。虽然此次疫情的源头无法确定,但我们的研究结果表明,感染可能是通过吸入被伯氏考克斯体污染的气溶胶或灰尘而发生的,这些气溶胶或灰尘从一个未确定的动物设施或本地野生动物或野生动物的排泄物中散布到全镇。或者传播可能是通过伴侣动物或蜱媒介发生的。