Suppr超能文献

保守治疗方式在骨坏死管理中的效用

The Utility of Conservative Treatment Modalities in the Management of Osteonecrosis.

作者信息

Osmani Feroz, Thakkar Savyasachi, Vigdorchik Jonathan

出版信息

Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2017 May;75(3):186-192.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Osteonecrosis is an ischemic pathologic process associated with a number of conditions affecting a range of age groups. The problem faced in the management of osteonecrosis is whether conservative treatment is a viable and effective option for patients. In this systematic review, we investigated the efficacy of various nonoperative treatment modalities for hip and knee osteonecrosis, including pharmacological management and biophysical modalities.

METHODS

We identified 16 studies based on electronic searches through the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL Plus, and Cochrane databases from January 2001 to November 2015. The therapies we assessed for the conservative osteonecrosis management included bisphosphonates, prostaglandin agents, enoxaparin, statins, hyperbaric oxygen, extracorporeal shockwave therapy, and pulsed electromagnetic field therapy.

RESULTS

Several studies have reported that early intervention (Fiscat stage I/II) osteonecrosis can be effectively managed conservatively. Pain levels and rate of bone necrosis was decreased with bisphosphonate use. Iloprost was seen to have improvement in pain, functional, and radiological outcomes. Progression of osteonecrosis was curbed with enoxaparin use. Statin use was seen to have protective effects on bone in patients taking high dose corticosteroids. The biophysical modalities (hyperbaric oxygen, extracorporeal shockwave therapy, and pulsed electromagnetic field therapy) all saw delay and partial reversal of disease progression.

CONCLUSION

Generally, stage I and II, prior to subchondral collapse, can be approached with both pharmacological and biophysical treatment modalities before more invasive measures, such as core decompression, are considered. At stage III and beyond, these conservative treatments are no longer viable treatment options. Further research must be performed to determine which modality carries the best cost to risk to benefit ratio in order to establish a standard of care for the treatment of osteonecrosis.

摘要

引言

骨坏死是一种缺血性病理过程,与多种影响不同年龄组的疾病相关。骨坏死治疗中面临的问题是保守治疗对患者而言是否是可行且有效的选择。在本系统评价中,我们研究了各种非手术治疗方式对髋部和膝部骨坏死的疗效,包括药物治疗和生物物理治疗方式。

方法

我们通过对2001年1月至2015年11月期间PubMed、Embase、CINAHL Plus和Cochrane数据库进行电子检索,确定了16项研究。我们评估的用于保守治疗骨坏死的疗法包括双膦酸盐、前列腺素制剂、依诺肝素、他汀类药物、高压氧、体外冲击波疗法和脉冲电磁场疗法。

结果

多项研究报告称,早期干预(Ficat I/II期)的骨坏死可以通过保守治疗有效控制。使用双膦酸盐可降低疼痛水平和骨坏死率。伊洛前列素在疼痛、功能和影像学结果方面有改善。使用依诺肝素可抑制骨坏死的进展。他汀类药物对服用高剂量皮质类固醇的患者的骨骼有保护作用。生物物理治疗方式(高压氧、体外冲击波疗法和脉冲电磁场疗法)均使疾病进展延迟并部分逆转。

结论

一般来说,在考虑采取更具侵入性的措施(如髓芯减压)之前,对于I期和II期、软骨下塌陷之前的情况,可采用药物和生物物理治疗方式。在III期及以后,这些保守治疗不再是可行的治疗选择。必须进行进一步研究以确定哪种治疗方式具有最佳的成本效益风险比,从而确立骨坏死治疗的护理标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验