Unit of Infection Models, Deutsches Primatenzentrum GmbH, Goettingen, Germany.
Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
J Virol. 2017 Nov 14;91(23). doi: 10.1128/JVI.01120-17. Print 2017 Dec 1.
An effective AIDS vaccine should elicit strong humoral and cellular immune responses while maintaining low levels of CD4 T-cell activation to avoid the generation of target cells for viral infection. The present study investigated two prime-boost regimens, both starting vaccination with single-cycle immunodeficiency virus, followed by two mucosal boosts with either recombinant adenovirus (rAd) or fowlpox virus (rFWPV) expressing SIVmac239 or SIVmac251 and genes, respectively. Finally, vectors were switched and systemically administered to the reciprocal group of animals. Only mucosal rFWPV immunizations followed by systemic rAd boost significantly protected animals against a repeated low-dose intrarectal challenge with pathogenic SIVmac251, resulting in a vaccine efficacy (i.e., risk reduction per exposure) of 68%. Delayed viral acquisition was associated with higher levels of activated CD8 T cells and Gag-specific gamma interferon (IFN-γ)-secreting CD8 cells, low virus-specific CD4 T-cell responses, and low Env antibody titers. In contrast, the systemic rFWPV boost induced strong virus-specific CD4 T-cell activity. rAd and rFWPV also induced differential patterns of the innate immune responses, thereby possibly shaping the specific immunity. Plasma levels after final immunization correlated directly with virus-specific CD4 T-cell responses and inversely with the number of exposures to infection. Also, the percentage of activated CD69 CD8 T cells correlated with the number of exposures to infection. Differential stimulation of the immune response likely provided the basis for the diverging levels of protection afforded by the vaccine regimen. A failed phase II AIDS vaccine trial led to the hypothesis that CD4 T-cell activation can abrogate any potentially protective effects delivered by vaccination or promote acquisition of the virus because CD4 T helper cells, required for an effective immune response, also represent the target cells for viral infection. We compared two vaccination protocols that elicited similar levels of Gag-specific immune responses in rhesus macaques. Only the animal group that had a low level of virus-specific CD4 T cells in combination with high levels of activated CD8 T cells was significantly protected from infection. Notably, protection was achieved despite the lack of appreciable Env antibody titers. Moreover, we show that both the vector and the route of immunization affected the level of CD4 T-cell responses. Thus, mucosal immunization with FWPV-based vaccines should be considered a potent prime in prime-boost vaccination protocols.
一种有效的艾滋病疫苗应该能够引起强烈的体液和细胞免疫反应,同时保持低水平的 CD4 T 细胞激活,以避免产生病毒感染的靶细胞。本研究调查了两种初免-加强免疫方案,均从单次循环免疫缺陷病毒开始免疫接种,然后分别用表达 SIVmac239 或 SIVmac251 基因的重组腺病毒(rAd)或禽痘病毒(rFWPV)进行两次粘膜加强免疫。最后,将载体切换并系统地给予另一组动物。只有粘膜 rFWPV 免疫接种后,系统给予 rAd 加强免疫,才能显著保护动物免受反复低剂量直肠内感染致病性 SIVmac251 的影响,从而使疫苗效力(即每暴露一次的风险降低)达到 68%。病毒延迟获得与更高水平的活化 CD8 T 细胞和 Gag 特异性伽马干扰素(IFN-γ)分泌 CD8 细胞、低病毒特异性 CD4 T 细胞反应和低Env 抗体滴度相关。相比之下,系统给予 rFWPV 加强免疫会引起强烈的病毒特异性 CD4 T 细胞活性。rAd 和 rFWPV 还诱导了不同的先天免疫反应模式,从而可能塑造了特异性免疫。最后一次免疫接种后的血浆水平与病毒特异性 CD4 T 细胞反应直接相关,与感染暴露次数成反比。此外,活化的 CD69 CD8 T 细胞的百分比与感染暴露次数相关。免疫反应的差异刺激可能为疫苗方案提供了不同保护水平的基础。一项失败的 II 期艾滋病疫苗试验导致了这样一种假设,即 CD4 T 细胞的激活可以消除疫苗接种带来的任何潜在保护作用,或者促进病毒的获得,因为 CD4 T 辅助细胞是有效免疫反应所必需的,也是病毒感染的靶细胞。我们比较了两种在恒河猴中引起类似 Gag 特异性免疫反应的疫苗接种方案。只有在病毒特异性 CD4 T 细胞水平低且高水平的活化 CD8 T 细胞的动物组,才受到显著保护免受感染。值得注意的是,尽管没有明显的 Env 抗体滴度,仍能实现保护。此外,我们还表明,载体和免疫途径都影响 CD4 T 细胞反应的水平。因此,基于 FWPV 的粘膜疫苗接种应被视为初免-加强免疫接种方案中的有效初免。