Suppr超能文献

双侧腹股沟疝无固定修补术后的网片移位

Mesh Displacement After Bilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair With No Fixation.

作者信息

Claus Christiano Marlo Paggi, Rocha Gabriela Moreira, Campos Antonio Carlos Ligocki, Paulin João Augusto Nocera, Coelho Julio Cesar Uili

机构信息

Minimally Invasive Surgery Department, Jacques Perissat Institute/Positivo University, Curitiba, Brazil.

Radiology Department, Hospital Nossa Senhora das Graças, Curitiba, Brazil.

出版信息

JSLS. 2017 Jul-Sep;21(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2017.00033.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

About 20% of patients with inguinal hernia present bilateral hernias in the diagnosis. In these cases, laparoscopic procedure is considered gold standard approach. Mesh fixation is considered important step toward avoiding recurrence. However, because of cost and risk of pain, real need for mesh fixation has been debated. For bilateral inguinal hernias, there are few specific data about non fixation and mesh displacement. We assessed mesh movement in patients who had undergone laparoscopic bilateral inguinal hernia repair without mesh fixation and compared the results with those obtained in patients with unilateral hernia.

METHODS

From January 2012 through May 2014, 20 consecutive patients with bilateral inguinal hernia underwent TEP repair with no mesh fixation. Results were compared with 50 consecutive patients with unilateral inguinal hernia surgically repaired with similar technique. Mesh was marked with 3 clips. Mesh movements were measured by comparing initial radiography performed at the end of surgery, with a second radiographic scan performed 30 days later.

RESULTS

Mean movements of all 3 clips in bilateral nonfixation (NF) group were 0.15-0.4 cm compared with 0.1-0.3 cm in unilateral NF group. Overall displacement of bilateral and unilateral NF groups did not show significant difference. Mean overall displacement was 1.9 cm versus 1.8 cm in the bilateral and unilateral NF groups, respectively ( = .78).

CONCLUSIONS

TEP with no mesh fixation is safe in bilateral inguinal repairs. Early mesh displacement is minimal. This technique can be safely used in most patients with inguinal hernia.

摘要

背景与目的

约20%的腹股沟疝患者在诊断时存在双侧疝。对于这些病例,腹腔镜手术被认为是金标准术式。补片固定被视为避免复发的重要步骤。然而,由于成本和疼痛风险,补片固定的实际需求一直存在争议。对于双侧腹股沟疝,关于不固定补片和补片移位的具体数据很少。我们评估了接受腹腔镜双侧腹股沟疝修补且未进行补片固定患者的补片移动情况,并将结果与单侧疝患者的结果进行比较。

方法

2012年1月至2014年5月,连续20例双侧腹股沟疝患者接受了无补片固定的TEP修补术。将结果与连续50例采用类似技术手术治疗的单侧腹股沟疝患者进行比较。用3个夹子标记补片。通过比较手术结束时进行的初始X线片与30天后进行的第二次X线扫描来测量补片移动情况。

结果

双侧不固定(NF)组所有3个夹子的平均移动为0.15 - 0.4 cm,而单侧NF组为0.1 - 0.3 cm。双侧和单侧NF组的总体移位没有显著差异。双侧和单侧NF组的平均总体移位分别为1.9 cm和1.8 cm(P = 0.78)。

结论

在双侧腹股沟修补术中,不进行补片固定的TEP是安全的。早期补片移位最小。该技术可安全用于大多数腹股沟疝患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae5f/5592431/e474642a7161/jls0201636450001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验