Köckerling F, Schug-Pass C, Adolf D, Keller T, Kuthe A
Department of Surgery and Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Vivantes Hospital, Academic Teaching Hospital of Charité Medical School, Neue Bergstraße 6, 13585, Berlin, Germany,
World J Surg. 2015 Aug;39(8):1887-94. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3055-z.
To date, no randomized controlled trials have been carried out to compare the perioperative outcome of unilateral and bilateral inguinal hernia repair using an endoscopic technique. In a Swiss registry study comparing unilateral with bilateral inguinal hernias, no further details were given regarding the nature of the intra- and postoperative complications. In addition, some authors have raised the issue of prophylactic repair of a clinically healthy other groin side.
In the Herniamed Registry, in total 9395 patients with a TEP were enrolled. These comprised 6700 patients with unilateral (71.31%) and 2695 patients (28.69%) with bilateral inguinal hernia repair. The outcome variables, analyzed in a multivariable model, were the intra- and postoperative as well as general complication rates, reoperation rate, duration of operation, and length of hospital stay.
While no significant difference was found in the overall number of intraoperative complications between the unilateral and bilateral group (p=0.310), a significantly higher number of urinary bladder injuries in the bilateral TEP operation of 0.28% compared with 0.04% for unilateral TEP (p=0,008) were noted. The greater probability of reoperation (0.82% for unilateral vs. 1.78% for bilateral TEP; p<0,001) in the unadjusted analysis was confirmed in the multivariable model [OR 2.35 (1.504; 3.322); p=0.001]. A significantly higher intraoperative urinary bladder injury rate and reoperation rate because of postoperative surgical complications constitute a difference in the perioperative outcome between unilateral and bilateral TEP which that warrants attention. Based on these results, prophylactic operation of the healthy other groin should not be recommended.
迄今为止,尚未进行随机对照试验来比较使用内镜技术进行单侧和双侧腹股沟疝修补术的围手术期结果。在一项瑞士登记研究中,比较了单侧和双侧腹股沟疝,但未给出关于术中和术后并发症性质的进一步细节。此外,一些作者提出了对临床上健康的另一侧腹股沟进行预防性修补的问题。
在疝病登记处,共纳入了9395例行完全腹膜外修补术(TEP)的患者。其中包括6700例单侧腹股沟疝修补患者(71.31%)和2695例双侧腹股沟疝修补患者(28.69%)。在多变量模型中分析的结果变量包括术中和术后以及总体并发症发生率、再次手术率、手术持续时间和住院时间。
虽然单侧和双侧组之间术中并发症的总数没有显著差异(p = 0.310),但注意到双侧TEP手术中膀胱损伤的发生率显著更高,为0.28%,而单侧TEP为0.04%(p = 0.008)。在未调整分析中,再次手术的可能性更大(单侧TEP为0.82%,双侧TEP为1.78%;p < 0.001),这在多变量模型中得到了证实[比值比2.35(1.504;3.322);p = 0.001]。术中膀胱损伤率显著更高以及因术后手术并发症导致的再次手术率更高,构成了单侧和双侧TEP围手术期结果的差异,值得关注。基于这些结果,不建议对健康的另一侧腹股沟进行预防性手术。