Löfstrand Jonas, Nyberg Marcus, Karlsson Therese, Thórarinsson Andri, Kjeller Göran, Lidén Mattias, Fröjd Victoria
Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018 Feb;34(2):108-120. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1606537. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
Free fibula flap (FFF) is considered gold standard in the reconstruction of mandibular defects. Despite the frequent use, patients' quality of life (QoL) after reconstruction has been sparsely investigated. This study aims to evaluate QoL and outcomes in patients who have undergone FFF reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects.
A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients ( = 73) operated at a single center during the years 2000 to 2014 was performed. Charts were reviewed and all living patients ( = 41) were invited to fill out three quality of life questionnaires (QLQ): SF-36, EORTC QLQ-C30, and QLQ-H&N35. Factors associated with poor outcome were derived from regression models and the results of the QLQs were compared with Swedish reference populations. Subgroup analysis was performed for two groups depending on reconstructive indication: cancer and osteoradionecrosis (ORN).
The response rate of the QLQs was 93%. General QoL did not differ from reference populations, but the study group had significantly larger proportions of poor functioning patients in three domains in EORTC QLQ-C30: global health status, role functioning, and social functioning. Patients also reported a high incidence of poor functioning/high symptom burden in EORTC QLQ-H&N35, with a significantly higher frequency in the ORN group compared with the cancer group for the domains "swallowing" and "social eating." The overall flap success rate was 92% and complication rate was 48%. Previous surgery had a significant association with reoperation due to bleeding, and longer duration of surgery was significantly associated with local infection.
When evaluated with validated QLQs, most patients experienced persistent functional loss in one or several domains, but still perceived a general QoL that is close to that of reference populations. Patients having ORN as the indication for surgery, as compared with cancer, reported a higher frequency of poor functioning patients in disease-specific QoL domains.
游离腓骨瓣(FFF)被认为是下颌骨缺损重建的金标准。尽管其使用频繁,但重建后患者的生活质量(QoL)却鲜有研究。本研究旨在评估接受节段性下颌骨缺损FFF重建患者的生活质量和治疗结果。
对2000年至2014年期间在单一中心接受手术的连续患者(n = 73)进行回顾性队列研究。查阅病历,并邀请所有在世患者(n = 41)填写三份生活质量问卷(QLQ):SF-36、欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷核心30项(EORTC QLQ-C30)和QLQ-头颈部癌症特异性问卷35项(QLQ-H&N35)。通过回归模型得出与不良预后相关的因素,并将QLQ的结果与瑞典参考人群进行比较。根据重建指征将两组患者进行亚组分析:癌症和放射性骨坏死(ORN)。
QLQ的回复率为93%。总体生活质量与参考人群无差异,但研究组在EORTC QLQ-C30的三个领域中功能不良患者的比例明显更高:整体健康状况、角色功能和社会功能。患者在EORTC QLQ-H&N35中也报告了较高的功能不良/高症状负担发生率,在“吞咽”和“社交进食”领域,ORN组的发生率明显高于癌症组。皮瓣总体成功率为92%,并发症发生率为48%。既往手术与因出血而再次手术显著相关,手术时间较长与局部感染显著相关。
当用经过验证的QLQ进行评估时,大多数患者在一个或几个领域经历了持续的功能丧失,但仍认为总体生活质量与参考人群相近。与癌症患者相比,以ORN作为手术指征的患者在疾病特异性生活质量领域报告的功能不良患者频率更高。