Scarlet Sara, Dreesen Elizabeth
A fifth-year general surgery resident and member of the hospital ethics committee at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
A trauma surgeon and the chief of the General and Acute Care Surgery Division of the Department of Surgery at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
AMA J Ethics. 2017 Sep 1;19(9):939-946. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.9.pfor1-1709.
Incarcerated patients frequently require surgery outside of the correctional setting, where they can be shackled to the operating table in the presence of armed corrections officers who observe them throughout the procedure. In this circumstance, privacy protection-central to the patient-physician relationship-and the need to control the incarcerated patient for the safety of health care workers, corrections officers, and society must be balanced. Surgeons recognize the heightened need for gaining a patient's trust within the context of an operation. For an anesthetized patient, undergoing an operation while shackled and observed by persons in positions of power is a violation of patient privacy that can lead to increased feelings of vulnerability, mistrust of health care professionals, and reduced therapeutic potential of a procedure.
被监禁的患者经常需要在惩教机构之外进行手术,在那里,他们可能会被铐在手术台上,同时有武装惩教人员在整个手术过程中监视他们。在这种情况下,隐私保护(医患关系的核心)与为了医护人员、惩教人员和社会安全而控制被监禁患者的需求必须取得平衡。外科医生认识到在手术过程中赢得患者信任的迫切需要。对于一名麻醉状态下的患者来说,在被铐住并被有权势的人监视的情况下接受手术,这侵犯了患者的隐私,可能会导致患者更强烈的脆弱感、对医护专业人员的不信任,以及降低手术的治疗效果。