Center of Space BioMedicine of the University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Laboratory of Neuromotor Physiology of the IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Cortex. 2017 Oct;95:172-191. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
There is considerable evidence that gravitational acceleration is taken into account in the interaction with falling targets through an internal model of Earth gravity. Here we asked whether this internal model is accessed also when target motion is imagined rather than real. In the main experiments, naïve participants grasped an imaginary ball, threw it against the ceiling, and caught it on rebound. In different blocks of trials, they had to imagine that the ball moved under terrestrial gravity (1g condition) or under microgravity (0g) as during a space flight. We measured the speed and timing of the throwing and catching actions, and plotted ball flight duration versus throwing speed. Best-fitting duration-speed curves estimate the laws of ball motion implicit in the participant's performance. Surprisingly, we found duration-speed curves compatible with 0g for both the imaginary 0g condition and the imaginary 1g condition, despite the familiarity with Earth gravity effects and the added realism of performing the throwing and catching actions. In a control experiment, naïve participants were asked to throw the imaginary ball vertically upwards at different heights, without hitting the ceiling, and to catch it on its way down. All participants overestimated ball flight durations relative to the durations predicted by the effects of Earth gravity. Overall, the results indicate that mental imagery of motion does not have access to the internal model of Earth gravity, but resorts to a simulation of visual motion. Because visual processing of accelerating/decelerating motion is poor, visual imagery of motion at constant speed or slowly varying speed appears to be the preferred mode to perform the tasks.
有相当多的证据表明,通过地球重力的内部模型,在与下落目标的相互作用中考虑了重力加速度。在这里,我们询问了当目标运动是想象的而不是真实的时,这种内部模型是否也被访问。在主要实验中,天真的参与者抓住一个想象中的球,将其扔向天花板,并在反弹时接住。在不同的试验块中,他们必须想象球在地球重力(1g 条件)或微重力(0g)下运动,就像在太空飞行中一样。我们测量了投掷和接球动作的速度和时间,并绘制了球飞行时间与投掷速度的关系图。最佳拟合的持续时间-速度曲线估计了参与者表现中隐含的球运动规律。令人惊讶的是,尽管对地球重力效应很熟悉并且执行投掷和接球动作的真实性增加,但我们发现,对于想象中的 0g 条件和想象中的 1g 条件,持续时间-速度曲线都与 0g 兼容。在一个对照实验中,天真的参与者被要求以不同的高度将想象中的球垂直向上扔,而不碰到天花板,并在下落时接住它。所有参与者都高估了球飞行时间,相对于地球重力效应预测的时间。总体而言,结果表明,运动的心理意象无法访问地球重力的内部模型,而是诉诸于视觉运动的模拟。由于对加速/减速运动的视觉处理不佳,以恒定速度或缓慢变化速度进行的运动视觉意象似乎是执行任务的首选模式。