• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将儿童社交技能训练与父母早期干预计划相结合,以治疗抑制型学龄前儿童。

Combining child social skills training with a parent early intervention program for inhibited preschool children.

机构信息

Centre for Emotional Health, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

Centre for Emotional Health, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

J Anxiety Disord. 2017 Oct;51:32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.08.007. Epub 2017 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.08.007
PMID:28910693
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of early intervention for anxiety in preschoolers through parent-education. The current study evaluated a six-session early intervention program for preschoolers at high risk of anxiety disorders in which a standard educational program for parents was supplemented by direct training of social skills to the children.

METHODS

Seventy-two children aged 3-5 years were selected based on high behavioural inhibition levels and concurrently having a parent with high emotional distress. Families were randomly assigned to either the intervention group, which consisted of six parent-education group sessions and six child social skills training sessions, or waitlist. After six months, families on waitlist were offered treatment consisting of parent-education only.

RESULTS

Relative to waitlist, children in the combined condition showed significantly fewer clinician-rated anxiety disorders and diagnostic severity and maternal (but not paternal) reported anxiety symptoms and life interference at six months. Mothers also reported less overprotection. These gains were maintained at 12-month follow-up. Parent only education following waitlist produced similar improvements among children. Quasi-experimental comparison between combined and parent-only interventions indicated greater reductions from combined intervention according to clinician reports, but no significant differences on maternal reports.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that this brief early intervention program for preschoolers with both parent and child components significantly reduces risk and disorder in vulnerable children. The inclusion of a child component might have the potential to increase effects over parent-only intervention. However, future support for this conclusion through long-term, randomised controlled trials is needed.

摘要

背景

先前的研究已经证明,通过家长教育对学龄前儿童进行早期干预可以有效治疗焦虑症。本研究评估了一种针对高焦虑障碍风险学龄前儿童的六节早期干预计划,该计划在为家长提供标准教育计划的基础上,为儿童提供社交技能的直接培训。

方法

根据高行为抑制水平和同时有高情绪困扰的父母,选择了 72 名 3-5 岁的儿童。家庭被随机分配到干预组或候补组。干预组包括六次家长教育组会议和六次儿童社交技能训练会议,候补组则先等待,六个月后,候补组的家庭可以选择接受仅包括家长教育的治疗。

结果

与候补组相比,联合组的儿童在六个月时,临床医生评定的焦虑症障碍和诊断严重程度以及母亲(而非父亲)报告的焦虑症状和生活干扰显著减少。母亲也报告了较少的过度保护。这些改善在 12 个月的随访中得到了维持。候补组接受仅家长教育后,儿童也取得了类似的改善。联合和仅家长干预的准实验比较表明,根据临床医生的报告,联合干预的效果更大,但母亲报告没有显著差异。

结论

研究结果表明,这种针对有父母和儿童参与的学龄前儿童的简短早期干预计划显著降低了弱势儿童的风险和障碍。纳入儿童组成部分可能具有增加超过仅家长干预效果的潜力。然而,需要通过长期、随机对照试验来提供对这一结论的未来支持。

相似文献

1
Combining child social skills training with a parent early intervention program for inhibited preschool children.将儿童社交技能训练与父母早期干预计划相结合,以治疗抑制型学龄前儿童。
J Anxiety Disord. 2017 Oct;51:32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.08.007. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
2
Internet-Delivered Parenting Program for Prevention and Early Intervention of Anxiety Problems in Young Children: Randomized Controlled Trial.互联网家长育儿计划预防和早期干预幼儿焦虑问题:随机对照试验。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 May;56(5):417-425.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
3
A selective intervention program for inhibited preschool-aged children of parents with an anxiety disorder: effects on current anxiety disorders and temperament.一项针对患有焦虑症父母的抑制型学龄前儿童的选择性干预项目:对当前焦虑症和气质的影响。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009 Jun;48(6):602-609. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e31819f6fa9.
4
Preliminary evaluation of a multimodal early intervention program for behaviorally inhibited preschoolers.一项针对行为抑制型学龄前儿童的多模式早期干预项目的初步评估。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Jun;83(3):534-40. doi: 10.1037/a0039043. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
5
Preventing anxiety problems in children with Cool Little Kids Online: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.通过“酷小孩在线”预防儿童焦虑问题:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Nov 5;16:507. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1022-5.
6
The preventative effects of a brief, early intervention for preschool-aged children at risk for internalising: follow-up into middle adolescence.对有内化风险的学龄前儿童进行早期简短干预的预防效果:随访至青少年中期。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013 Jul;54(7):780-8. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12048. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
7
Does Stepping Stones Triple P plus Acceptance and Commitment Therapy improve parent, couple, and family adjustment following paediatric acquired brain injury? A randomised controlled trial.阶梯式父母效能训练联合接受与承诺疗法是否能改善儿科获得性脑损伤后父母、夫妇和家庭的适应情况?一项随机对照试验。
Behav Res Ther. 2015 Oct;73:58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.07.001. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
8
Enhancing the early home learning environment through a brief group parenting intervention: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.通过简短的小组育儿干预增强早期家庭学习环境:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Pediatr. 2016 Jun 2;16:73. doi: 10.1186/s12887-016-0610-1.
9
Altering the trajectory of anxiety in at-risk young children.改变高危幼儿焦虑的轨迹。
Am J Psychiatry. 2010 Dec;167(12):1518-25. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09111619. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
10
Early intervention for inhibited young children: a randomized controlled trial comparing the Turtle Program and Cool Little Kids.早期干预抑制型幼儿:“海龟项目”与“酷小孩”的随机对照试验
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2022 Mar;63(3):273-281. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13475. Epub 2021 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevention of internalizing disorders in early childhood.幼儿期内化性障碍预防的系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 14;14:1061825. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1061825. eCollection 2023.
2
Parental Intervention Program for Preschool children with Rare Diseases - a mixed methods evaluation of parents' experiences and utility.罕见病学龄前儿童父母干预项目——父母体验和效用的混合方法评估。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023 Oct 17;18(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02935-8.
3
Preliminary perceived intervention changes and engagement in an evidence-based program targeted at behavioral inhibition during early childhood, delivered in-person and online.
初步感知到的干预变化以及对一项针对幼儿期行为抑制的循证项目的参与情况,该项目通过面对面和在线方式开展。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 26;14:1187255. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1187255. eCollection 2023.
4
Anxiety in children and youth: Part 2-The management of anxiety disorders.儿童和青少年焦虑症:第二部分——焦虑症的管理
Paediatr Child Health. 2023 Feb 28;28(1):52-66. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxac104. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
Early Detection of Temperament Risk Factors: A Comparison of Clinically Referred and General Population Children.气质风险因素的早期检测:临床转诊儿童与普通人群儿童的比较
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 24;12:667503. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.667503. eCollection 2021.
6
Validation of the Italian Version of the Behavioral Inhibition Questionnaire (BIQ) for Preschool Children.验证《学前儿童行为抑制问卷》(BIQ)意大利语版本的有效性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 21;18(11):5522. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115522.
7
Parenting Characteristics among Adults With Social Anxiety and their Influence on Social Anxiety Development in Children: A Brief Integrative Review.社交焦虑成年人的养育特征及其对儿童社交焦虑发展的影响:简要综合综述
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 28;12:614318. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.614318. eCollection 2021.
8
Chinese American children's temperamental shyness and responses to peer victimization as moderated by maternal praise.美籍华裔儿童的气质性害羞和对同伴侵害的反应会受到母亲表扬的调节。
J Fam Psychol. 2021 Aug;35(5):680-690. doi: 10.1037/fam0000831. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
9
Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年焦虑症的认知行为疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 16;11(11):CD013162. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013162.pub2.
10
Prospective Association between Childhood Behavioral Inhibition and Anxiety: a Meta-Analysis.前瞻性儿童行为抑制与焦虑的关联:一项荟萃分析。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2020 Jan;48(1):57-66. doi: 10.1007/s10802-019-00588-5.