Mental Health Department, Servicio Navarro de Salud, Pamplona, Spain.
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain.
Schizophr Bull. 2017 Sep 1;43(5):956-971. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbx089.
Motor abnormalities (MAs) of severe mental disorders have been traditionally neglected both in clinical practice and research, although they are an increasing focus of attention because of their clinical and neurobiological relevance. For historical reasons, most of the literature on MAs has been focused to a great extent on schizophrenia, and as a consequence their prevalence and featural properties in other psychiatric or neuropsychiatric disorders are poorly known. In this article, we evaluated the extent to which catatonic, extrapyramidal and neurological soft signs, and their associated clinical features, are present transdiagnostically.
We examined motor-related features in neurodevelopmental (schizophrenia, obsessive compulsive disorder, autism spectrum disorders), "functional" (nonschizophrenic nonaffective psychoses, mood disorders) and neurodegenerative (Alzheimer's disease) disorders. Examination of the literature revealed that there have been very few comparisons of motor-related features across diagnoses and we had to rely mainly in disorder-specific studies to compare it transdiagnostically.
One or more motor domains had a substantial prevalence in all the diagnoses examined. In "functional" disorders, MAs, and particularly catatonic signs, appear to be markers of episode severity; in chronic disorders, although with different degree of strength or evidence, all motor domains are indicators of both disorder severity and poor outcome; lastly, in Alzheimer's disease they are also indicators of disorder progression.
MAs appear to represent a true transdiagnostic domain putatively sharing neurobiological mechanisms of neurodevelopmental, functional or neurodegenerative origin.
严重精神障碍的运动异常(MAs)在临床实践和研究中一直被传统忽视,尽管由于其临床和神经生物学相关性,它们越来越受到关注。由于历史原因,大多数关于 MAs 的文献在很大程度上都集中在精神分裂症上,因此,它们在其他精神或神经精神障碍中的患病率和特征性质知之甚少。在本文中,我们评估了紧张症、锥体外系和神经学软性体征及其相关临床特征在跨诊断中的存在程度。
我们检查了神经发育障碍(精神分裂症、强迫症、自闭症谱系障碍)、“功能性”(非精神分裂症非情感性精神病、心境障碍)和神经退行性疾病(阿尔茨海默病)中与运动相关的特征。文献研究表明,跨诊断比较运动相关特征的研究非常少,我们不得不主要依赖于特定于疾病的研究来进行跨诊断比较。
在所有检查的诊断中,一个或多个运动领域都有相当大的患病率。在“功能性”障碍中,MAs,特别是紧张症迹象,似乎是发作严重程度的标志物;在慢性障碍中,尽管强度或证据不同,所有运动领域都是障碍严重程度和不良预后的指标;最后,在阿尔茨海默病中,它们也是障碍进展的指标。
MAs 似乎代表了一个真正的跨诊断领域,可能具有神经发育、功能或神经退行性起源的神经生物学机制。