Ng K T, Gillies M, Griffith D M
Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Consultant Anaesthetist and Senior Lecturer in Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2017 Sep;45(5):556-561. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1704500505.
Nicotine replacement therapy is widely used in critically ill smokers and its effect on delirium, mortality and duration of intensive care unit (ICU) admission is unknown. The aims of this review were to determine whether the management of nicotine withdrawal with nicotine replacement therapy reduces delirium, mortality or length of stay in critically ill smokers in ICU. The primary outcome was incidence of author-defined ICU delirium. Secondary outcomes were ICU or hospital mortality, ICU-free days at day 28, and ICU or hospital length of stay. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the data sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for randomised controlled trials and observational studies. Clinical trials, observational studies and systematic reviews comparing nicotine replacement therapy with placebo or no treatment were included. Case reports, case series, non-systematic reviews and studies that involved children were excluded. Eight studies were eligible (n=2,636) for inclusion in the data synthesis. In a meta-analysis of observational studies, nicotine replacement therapy was associated with increased delirium (three studies; n=908; I=0%; finite element method: odds ratio 4.03 [95% confidence interval 2.64, 6.15]; <0.001). There was no difference in ICU mortality (three studies; n=1,309; =0.10, I=44%; finite element method: odds ratio 0.58; 95% confidence intervals 0.31-1.10) and hospital mortality or 28-day ICU-free days. In the absence of high-quality data, nicotine replacement therapy cannot currently be recommended for routine use to prevent delirium or to reduce hospital or ICU mortality in critically ill smokers.
尼古丁替代疗法广泛应用于重症吸烟者,但其对谵妄、死亡率及重症监护病房(ICU)住院时长的影响尚不清楚。本综述的目的是确定采用尼古丁替代疗法管理尼古丁戒断是否能降低重症吸烟者在ICU中的谵妄、死亡率或住院时长。主要结局是作者定义的ICU谵妄发生率。次要结局包括ICU或医院死亡率、第28天无ICU天数以及ICU或医院住院时长。我们对MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL以及Cochrane系统评价数据库进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以获取随机对照试验和观察性研究的数据。纳入比较尼古丁替代疗法与安慰剂或不治疗的临床试验、观察性研究和系统评价。排除病例报告、病例系列、非系统评价以及涉及儿童的研究。八项研究(n = 2636)符合纳入数据合成的标准。在观察性研究的荟萃分析中,尼古丁替代疗法与谵妄增加相关(三项研究;n = 908;I² = 0%;有限元法:比值比4.03 [95%置信区间2.64, 6.15];P < 0.001)。ICU死亡率(三项研究;n = 1309;I² = 0.10,I² = 44%;有限元法:比值比0.58;95%置信区间0.31 - 1.10)、医院死亡率或第28天无ICU天数无差异。在缺乏高质量数据的情况下,目前不建议常规使用尼古丁替代疗法来预防谵妄或降低重症吸烟者的医院或ICU死亡率。