Ekjut, Chakradharpur, Jharkhand, India.
Sitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research, New Delhi, India.
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Oct;5(10):e1004-e1016. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30339-X.
Around 30% of the world's stunted children live in India. The Government of India has proposed a new cadre of community-based workers to improve nutrition in 200 districts. We aimed to find out the effect of such a worker carrying out home visits and participatory group meetings on children's linear growth.
We did a cluster-randomised controlled trial in two adjoining districts of Jharkhand and Odisha, India. 120 clusters (around 1000 people each) were randomly allocated to intervention or control using a lottery. Randomisation took place in July, 2013, and was stratified by district and number of hamlets per cluster (0, 1-2, or ≥3), resulting in six strata. In each intervention cluster, a worker carried out one home visit in the third trimester of pregnancy, monthly visits to children younger than 2 years to support feeding, hygiene, care, and stimulation, as well as monthly women's group meetings to promote individual and community action for nutrition. Participants were pregnant women identified and recruited in the study clusters and their children. We excluded stillbirths and neonatal deaths, infants whose mothers died, those with congenital abnormalities, multiple births, and mother and infant pairs who migrated out of the study area permanently during the trial period. Data collectors visited each woman in pregnancy, within 72 h of her baby's birth, and at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months after birth. The primary outcome was children's length-for-age Z score at 18 months of age. Analyses were by intention to treat. Due to the nature of the intervention, participants and the intervention team were not masked to allocation. Data collectors and the data manager were masked to allocation. The trial is registered as ISCRTN (51505201) and with the Clinical Trials Registry of India (number 2014/06/004664).
Between Oct 1, 2013, and Dec 31, 2015, we recruited 5781 pregnant women. 3001 infants were born to pregnant women recruited between Oct 1, 2013, and Feb 10, 2015, and were therefore eligible for follow-up (1460 assigned to intervention; 1541 assigned to control). Three groups of children could not be included in the final analysis: 147 migrated out of the study area (67 in intervention clusters; 80 in control clusters), 77 died after the neonatal period and before 18 months (31 in intervention clusters; 46 in control clusters), and seven had implausible length-for-age Z scores (<-5 SD; one in intervention cluster; six in control clusters). We measured 1253 (92%) of 1362 eligible children at 18 months in intervention clusters, and 1308 (92%) of 1415 eligible children in control clusters. Mean length-for-age Z score at 18 months was -2·31 (SD 1·12) in intervention clusters and -2·40 (SD 1·10) in control clusters (adjusted difference 0·107, 95% CI -0·011 to 0·226, p=0·08). The intervention did not significantly affect exclusive breastfeeding, timely introduction of complementary foods, morbidity, appropriate home care or care-seeking during childhood illnesses. In intervention clusters, more pregnant women and children attained minimum dietary diversity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] for women 1·39, 95% CI 1·03-1·90; for children 1·47, 1·07-2·02), more mothers washed their hands before feeding children (5·23, 2·61-10·5), fewer children were underweight at 18 months (0·81, 0·66-0·99), and fewer infants died (0·63, 0·39-1·00).
Introduction of a new worker in areas with a high burden of undernutrition in rural eastern India did not significantly increase children's length. However, certain secondary outcomes such as self-reported dietary diversity and handwashing, as well as infant survival were improved. The interventions tested in this trial can be further optimised for use at scale, but substantial improvements in growth will require investment in nutrition-sensitive interventions, including clean water, sanitation, family planning, girls' education, and social safety nets.
UK Medical Research Council, Wellcome Trust, UK Department for International Development (DFID).
全球发育迟缓儿童约有 30%生活在印度。印度政府提议在 200 个地区设立新的社区工作者,以改善营养状况。我们旨在了解此类工作人员进行家访和参与小组会议对儿童线性生长的影响。
我们在印度恰尔肯德邦和奥里萨邦的两个毗邻地区进行了一项集群随机对照试验。采用抽签法将 120 个集群(约 1000 人)随机分配至干预组或对照组。2013 年 7 月进行随机分组,按地区和每个集群的小村庄数量(0、1-2 或≥3)进行分层,共分为 6 个层次。在每个干预集群中,一名工作人员在妊娠晚期进行一次家访,在 2 岁以下的儿童中每月进行一次访视,以支持喂养、卫生、护理和刺激,并每月召开妇女小组会议,以促进个人和社区的营养行动。参与者是在研究集群中确定并招募的孕妇及其子女。我们排除了死胎和新生儿死亡、母亲死亡的婴儿、先天畸形、多胎和在试验期间永久迁移出研究区域的母婴对。数据收集员在妊娠期间、婴儿出生后 72 小时内、出生后 3、6、9、12 和 18 个月时对每位女性进行了访问。主要结局是 18 个月时儿童的年龄别身长 Z 评分。分析采用意向治疗。由于干预的性质,参与者和干预团队对分配情况没有设盲。数据收集员和数据管理员对分配情况设盲。该试验在 ISCRTN(51505201)和印度临床试验注册中心(编号 2014/06/004664)进行了注册。
2013 年 10 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日期间,我们招募了 5781 名孕妇。在 2013 年 10 月 1 日至 2 月 10 日期间招募的 3001 名婴儿出生,因此有资格进行随访(1460 名分配至干预组;1541 名分配至对照组)。有三组儿童无法纳入最终分析:147 名迁移出研究区域(干预组 67 名;对照组 80 名),77 名新生儿期后至 18 个月前死亡(干预组 31 名;对照组 46 名),7 名长度年龄 Z 评分不可信(<-5 SD;干预组 1 名;对照组 6 名)。我们在干预组中测量了 1253 名(92%)18 个月大的合格儿童,在对照组中测量了 1308 名(92%)1415 名合格儿童。干预组 18 个月时的平均年龄别身长 Z 评分为-2.31(SD 1.12),对照组为-2.40(SD 1.10)(调整后的差异 0.107,95%CI-0.011 至 0.226,p=0.08)。该干预措施并未显著影响纯母乳喂养、及时引入补充食品、发病率、适当的家庭护理或儿童患病时的求医行为。在干预组中,更多的孕妇和儿童达到了最低饮食多样性(女性调整后的优势比 [aOR] 为 1.39,95%CI 为 1.03-1.90;儿童为 1.47,1.07-2.02),更多的母亲在喂养孩子前洗手(5.23,2.61-10.5),18 个月时体重不足的儿童较少(0.81,0.66-0.99),婴儿死亡率降低(0.63,0.39-1.00)。
在印度东部营养负担沉重的农村地区引入新的工作人员并没有显著增加儿童的身高。然而,某些次要结局,如自我报告的饮食多样性和洗手,以及婴儿存活率得到了改善。本试验中测试的干预措施可以进一步优化,以便在更大范围内使用,但要显著改善生长状况,需要投资于营养敏感型干预措施,包括清洁水、卫生设施、计划生育、女孩教育和社会安全网。
英国医学研究理事会、惠康信托基金、英国国际发展部(DFID)。