Benyahia Najoua Mokraï, Verster Ann, Saldien Vera, Breebaart Margaretha, Sermeus Luc, Vercauteren Marcel
Department of Anaesthesia, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care. 2015 Apr;22(1):25-33.
The use of regional anaesthesia techniques for intra-operative anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia remains very controversial for patients scheduled to undergo spinal interventions. Spine surgeries, especially the most extensive types, are mostly performed under general anaesthesia. This has to be explained by the position required during surgery, the preference of the surgeon and/or anaesthesiologist and lack of sufficient literature supporting locoregional anaesthesia. In addition, there is an increasing trend to prefer general anaesthesia for spinal surgery. Nevertheless, with respect to spine surgeries more than 80% of the actual literature on neuraxial blocks is dated less than 12 years. The present overview was focused in the first place on the feasibility of (loco) regional techniques to be used intra-operatively. These techniques are also of interest for postoperative analgesia, either with a single bolus injection of local anaesthetics, opioids and adjuvants, alone or in combination, in continuous or intermittent administration and requiring the presence of foreign material in the neighborhood of the surgical field. As all techniques described offered variable success rates, future research is mandatory to determine their superiority over general intra-operative anaesthesia and conventional pain therapy with paracetamol, NSAIDs, opioids used alone or in combination.
对于计划接受脊柱手术的患者,使用区域麻醉技术进行术中麻醉和术后镇痛仍然存在很大争议。脊柱手术,尤其是最复杂的类型,大多在全身麻醉下进行。这必须从手术所需的体位、外科医生和/或麻醉医生的偏好以及缺乏支持局部区域麻醉的充分文献来解释。此外,脊柱手术更倾向于全身麻醉的趋势正在增加。然而,关于脊柱手术,超过80%的有关神经轴阻滞的实际文献的日期不到12年。本综述首先关注(局部)区域技术用于术中的可行性。这些技术对于术后镇痛也很有意义,无论是单次推注局部麻醉药、阿片类药物和佐剂,单独使用或联合使用,持续或间歇给药,并且需要在手术区域附近存在异物。由于所描述的所有技术成功率各不相同,未来必须进行研究以确定它们相对于术中全身麻醉和使用对乙酰氨基酚、非甾体抗炎药、单独或联合使用的阿片类药物的传统疼痛治疗的优越性。