School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
School of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Soc Stud Sci. 2017 Dec;47(6):918-941. doi: 10.1177/0306312717728344. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
In the wake of the widespread uptake of and debate surrounding the work of Karen Barad, this article revisits her core conceptual contributions. We offer descriptions, elaborations, problematizations and provocations for those intrigued by or invested in this body of work. We examine Barad's use of quantum physics, which underpins her conception of the material world. We discuss the political strengths of this position but also note tensions associated with applying quantum physics to phenomena at macro-scales. We identify both frictions and unacknowledged affinities with science and technology studies in Barad's critique of reflexivity and her concept of diffraction. We flesh out Barad's overarching position of 'agential realism', which contains a revised understanding of scientific apparatuses. Building upon these discussions, we argue that inherent in agential realism is both an ethics of inclusion and an ethics of exclusion. Existing research has, however, frequently emphasized entanglement and inclusion to the detriment of foreclosure and exclusion. Nonetheless, we contend that it is in the potential for an ethics of exclusion that Barad's work could be of greatest utility within science and technology studies and beyond.
在广泛接受和围绕凯伦·巴纳德(Karen Barad)的工作展开辩论之后,本文重新审视了她的核心概念贡献。我们为那些对这一工作感兴趣或有兴趣的人提供了描述、阐述、问题化和挑衅。我们考察了巴纳德对量子物理学的运用,这是她对物质世界概念的基础。我们讨论了这一立场的政治优势,但也注意到将量子物理学应用于宏观现象时所产生的紧张关系。我们在巴纳德对反思性的批判和她的衍射概念中发现了与科学技术研究的摩擦和未被承认的亲和性。我们详细阐述了巴纳德的主导地位“代理现实主义”,其中包含了对科学仪器的修正理解。在这些讨论的基础上,我们认为代理现实主义内在地包含了包容伦理和排斥伦理。然而,现有研究常常强调纠缠和包容,而忽视了排除和排斥。尽管如此,我们认为,正是在排斥伦理的可能性中,巴纳德的工作在科学技术研究及其以外的领域可能具有最大的效用。