Department of Geography, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
Department of Geography, Universities of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Med Humanit. 2020 Dec;46(4):499-511. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2019-011778. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
Animals used in biological research and testing have become integrated into the trajectories of modern biomedicine, generating increased expectations for and connections between human and animal health. Animal research also remains controversial and its acceptability is contingent on a complex network of relations and assurances across science and society, which are both formally constituted through law and informal or assumed. In this paper, we propose these entanglements can be studied through an approach that understands animal research as a nexus spanning the domains of science, health and animal welfare. We introduce this argument through, first, outlining some key challenges in UK debates around animal research, and second, reviewing the way nexus concepts have been used to connect issues in environmental research. Third, we explore how existing social sciences and humanities scholarship on animal research tends to focus on different aspects of the connections between scientific research, human health and animal welfare, which we suggest can be combined in a nexus approach. In the fourth section, we introduce our collaborative research on the animal research nexus, indicating how this approach can be used to study the history, governance and changing sensibilities around UK laboratory animal research. We suggest the attention to complex connections in nexus approaches can be enriched through conversations with the social sciences and medical humanities in ways that deepen appreciation of the importance of path-dependency and contingency, inclusion and exclusion in governance and the affective dimension to research. In conclusion, we reflect on the value of nexus thinking for developing research that is interdisciplinary, interactive and reflexive in understanding how accounts of the histories and current relations of animal research have significant implications for how scientific practices, policy debates and broad social contracts around animal research are being remade today.
动物在生物研究和测试中的应用已经融入了现代生物医学的发展轨迹,这使得人们对人类和动物健康之间的联系和相互作用产生了更高的期望。动物研究仍然存在争议,其可接受性取决于科学和社会之间复杂的关系网络和保证,这些关系和保证既通过法律正式构成,也通过非正式或假设的方式构成。在本文中,我们提出可以通过一种理解动物研究的方法来研究这些纠缠,这种方法将动物研究视为跨越科学、健康和动物福利领域的纽带。我们首先概述了英国围绕动物研究的一些关键挑战,其次回顾了连接概念在环境研究中被用来连接问题的方式,以此来介绍这一论点。第三,我们探讨了现有的关于动物研究的社会科学和人文学术研究如何倾向于关注科学研究、人类健康和动物福利之间联系的不同方面,我们认为这些方面可以在纽带方法中结合起来。在第四节中,我们介绍了我们关于动物研究纽带的合作研究,指出了这种方法如何用于研究英国实验室动物研究的历史、治理和不断变化的敏感性。我们认为,通过与社会科学和医学人文学科的对话,可以丰富对联系纽带的关注,加深对治理中路径依赖性和偶然性、包容性和排斥性以及研究的情感维度的重要性的认识。最后,我们反思了联系思维在发展跨学科、互动和反思性研究方面的价值,这些研究有助于理解动物研究的历史和当前关系的描述如何对科学实践、政策辩论和围绕动物研究的广泛社会契约的重塑产生重大影响。