McCleary Lynn, Boscart Veronique, Donahue Peter, Harvey Kelsey
Department of Nursing,Brock University.
School of Health & Life Sciences and Community Services,Conestoga College.
Can J Aging. 2017 Dec;36(4):501-513. doi: 10.1017/S0714980817000381. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
This study investigated the state of gerontology content in health and social service education programs in Ontario, and readiness indicators for change among administrators and faculty. We conducted a survey of teaching faculty (n = 100) and deans or directors (n = 56) of 89 education programs, which revealed mixed evidence on readiness for change. Most respondents thought their programs were adequate but needed enhancement. However, they were unaware of published gerontological competencies with which to evaluate their curricula. Beliefs about capacity for change varied, with half the participants indicating that their programs had sufficient faculty expertise in gerontology and geriatrics. Factors influencing readiness for change include lack of gerontological expertise; need for institutional and management support; need for additional teaching resources; and recognizing the need for change. There is an opportunity, by committing resources and time, to capitalize on the faculty and administrators who thought their programs should improve.
本研究调查了安大略省健康与社会服务教育项目中的老年医学内容状况,以及管理人员和教师对变革的准备指标。我们对89个教育项目的教师(n = 100)和院长或主任(n = 56)进行了一项调查,结果显示在变革准备方面存在不同的证据。大多数受访者认为他们的项目足够,但需要改进。然而,他们并不知晓用于评估课程的已发表的老年医学能力标准。对变革能力的看法各不相同,一半的参与者表示他们的项目在老年医学和老年病学方面有足够的教师专业知识。影响变革准备的因素包括缺乏老年医学专业知识;需要机构和管理支持;需要额外的教学资源;以及认识到变革的必要性。通过投入资源和时间,有机会利用那些认为他们的项目应该改进的教师和管理人员。