Grebe Eduard, Welte Alex, Hall Jake, Keating Sheila M, Facente Shelley N, Marson Kara, Martin Jeffrey N, Little Susan J, Price Matthew A, Kallas Esper G, Busch Michael P, Pilcher Christopher D, Murphy Gary
*South African Centre for Epidemiological Modelling and Analysis (SACEMA), Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa; †National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom; ‡Blood Systems Research Institute, San Francisco, CA; §School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; ‖Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; ¶Department of Medical Affairs, International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI), New York City, NY; and #Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017 Dec 15;76(5):547-555. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001537.
Custom HIV staging assays, including the Sedia HIV-1 Limiting Antigen (LAg) Avidity EIA and avidity modifications of the Ortho VITROS anti-HIV-1+2 and Abbott ARCHITECT HIV Ag/Ab Combo assays, are used to identify "recent" infections in clinical settings and for cross-sectional HIV incidence estimation. However, the high dynamic range of chemiluminescent platforms allows differentiating recent and long-standing infection on signal intensity, and this raises the prospect of using unmodified diagnostic assays for infection timing and surveillance applications.
We tested a panel of 2500 well-characterized specimens with estimable duration of HIV infection with the 3 assays and the unmodified ARCHITECT. Regression models were used to estimate mean durations of recent infection (MDRIs), context-specific false-recent rates (FRRs) and correlation between diagnostic signal intensity and LAg measurements. Hypothetical epidemiological scenarios were constructed to evaluate utility in surveillance applications.
Over a range of MDRIs (reflecting recency discrimination thresholds), a diluted ARCHITECT-based RITA produced lower FRRs than the VITROS platform (FRR ≈ 0.5% and 1.5%, respectively at MDRI ≈ 200 days), and the unmodified diagnostic ARCHITECT produces incidence estimates with comparable precision to LAg (relative SE ≈ 17.5% and 15%, respectively at MDRI ≈ 200 days). ARCHITECT S/CO measurements were highly correlated with LAg optical density measurements (r = 0.80), and values below 200 are strongly predictive of LAg recency and duration of infection less than 1 year.
Low quantitative measurements from the unmodified ARCHITECT obviate the need for additional recency testing, and its use is feasible in clinical staging and incidence surveillance applications.
定制的HIV分期检测方法,包括Sedia HIV-1限量抗原(LAg)亲和力酶免疫分析以及对Ortho VITROS抗HIV-1+2和雅培ARCHITECT HIV抗原/抗体联合检测方法的亲和力改良,用于在临床环境中识别“近期”感染以及进行横断面HIV发病率估计。然而,化学发光平台的高动态范围使得能够根据信号强度区分近期感染和长期感染,这为将未改良的诊断检测方法用于感染时间判定和监测应用带来了前景。
我们使用这3种检测方法以及未改良的ARCHITECT检测了一组2500份具有明确HIV感染持续时间的特征良好的标本。采用回归模型来估计近期感染的平均持续时间(MDRIs)、特定背景下的假近期率(FRRs)以及诊断信号强度与LAg测量值之间的相关性。构建了假设的流行病学场景以评估其在监测应用中的效用。
在一系列MDRIs(反映近期感染区分阈值)范围内,基于稀释ARCHITECT的RITA产生的FRRs低于VITROS平台(在MDRI约为200天时,FRR分别约为0.5%和1.5%),并且未改良的诊断性ARCHITECT产生的发病率估计精度与LAg相当(在MDRI约为200天时,相对标准误分别约为17.5%和15%)。ARCHITECT S/CO测量值与LAg光密度测量值高度相关(r = 0.80),低于200的值强烈预测LAg近期感染以及感染持续时间少于1年。
未改良的ARCHITECT的低定量测量无需额外的近期感染检测,并且其在临床分期和发病率监测应用中是可行的。