Murphy G, Pilcher C D, Keating S M, Kassanjee R, Facente S N, Welte A, Grebe E, Marson K, Busch M P, Dailey P, Parkin N, Osborn J, Ongarello S, Marsh K, Garcia-Calleja J M
Public Health England,London,UK.
University of California,San Francisco,San Francisco,CA,USA.
Epidemiol Infect. 2017 Apr;145(5):925-941. doi: 10.1017/S0950268816002910. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
In 2011 the Incidence Assay Critical Path Working Group reviewed the current state of HIV incidence assays and helped to determine a critical path to the introduction of an HIV incidence assay. At that time the Consortium for Evaluation and Performance of HIV Incidence Assays (CEPHIA) was formed to spur progress and raise standards among assay developers, scientists and laboratories involved in HIV incidence measurement and to structure and conduct a direct independent comparative evaluation of the performance of 10 existing HIV incidence assays, to be considered singly and in combinations as recent infection test algorithms. In this paper we report on a new framework for HIV incidence assay evaluation that has emerged from this effort over the past 5 years, which includes a preliminary target product profile for an incidence assay, a consensus around key performance metrics along with analytical tools and deployment of a standardized approach for incidence assay evaluation. The specimen panels for this evaluation have been collected in large volumes, characterized using a novel approach for infection dating rules and assembled into panels designed to assess the impact of important sources of measurement error with incidence assays such as viral subtype, elite host control of viraemia and antiretroviral treatment. We present the specific rationale for several of these innovations, and discuss important resources for assay developers and researchers that have recently become available. Finally, we summarize the key remaining steps on the path to development and implementation of reliable assays for monitoring HIV incidence at a population level.
2011年,发病率检测关键路径工作组审查了HIV发病率检测的现状,并协助确定了引入HIV发病率检测的关键路径。当时,成立了HIV发病率检测评估与性能联盟(CEPHIA),以推动进展并提高参与HIV发病率测量的检测开发者、科学家和实验室的标准,并构建和开展对10种现有HIV发病率检测性能的直接独立比较评估,这些检测将单独以及作为近期感染检测算法组合进行考量。在本文中,我们报告了过去5年这项工作中出现的一种HIV发病率检测评估新框架,其中包括发病率检测的初步目标产品概况、围绕关键性能指标的共识以及分析工具,并部署了一种发病率检测评估的标准化方法。此次评估的样本组已大量收集,采用一种新颖的感染时间确定规则方法进行了特征描述,并组装成旨在评估发病率检测中重要测量误差来源(如病毒亚型、病毒血症的精英宿主控制和抗逆转录病毒治疗)影响的样本组。我们阐述了其中几项创新的具体原理,并讨论了检测开发者和研究人员最近可获得的重要资源。最后,我们总结了在人群层面开发和实施可靠的HIV发病率监测检测路径上剩余关键步骤。