Suppr超能文献

数字断层融合摄影术与计算机断层扫描在检测和测量肺结节方面是否具有同等价值?

Is Digital Tomosynthesis on Par With Computed Tomography for the Detection and Measurement of Pulmonary Nodules?

机构信息

*Department of Thoracic Medicine, University of Queensland Thoracic Research Centre ‡Department of Medical Imaging ∥Biomedical Technology Services, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside †School of Medicine, University of Queensland, St Lucia §Department of Medical Imaging, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.

出版信息

J Thorac Imaging. 2017 Nov;32(6):W67-W68. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000298.

Abstract

Chest digital tomosynthesis (DT) has potential advantages compared to computed tomography (CT) such as radiation dose reduction. However, the role of DT in pulmonary nodule management remains investigative. We compared DT against CT for pulmonary nodule detection and size measurement. A clinical population comprising 54 nodules from 30 patients and a screening population comprising 42 nodules from 52 patients were included. Scans were independently read by two radiologists. Agreement in nodule measurements between readers and between modalities was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis using a 95% level of significance. The DT true positive fraction for the two readers was 0.44 and 0.39 in the clinical population, and 0.10 and 0.05 in the screening population. No significant inter-modality bias was observed between DT and CT measurements of nodule size, but the range of variation between modalities was approximately 30%. Inter-reader DT measurements also showed no significant bias, with a range of variation of approximately 15%. We conclude that DT has poor nodule detection sensitivity compared to CT. However, DT showed good measurement reproducibility and may be useful for monitoring growth of existing pulmonary nodules.

摘要

胸部数字断层合成术(DT)与计算机断层扫描(CT)相比具有潜在优势,例如减少辐射剂量。然而,DT 在肺结节管理中的作用仍在研究中。我们比较了 DT 与 CT 在肺结节检测和大小测量方面的性能。临床人群包括 30 名患者的 54 个结节,筛查人群包括 52 名患者的 42 个结节。由两名放射科医生独立阅读扫描结果。采用 95%置信区间的 Bland-Altman 分析评估读者之间和模态之间的结节测量一致性。两位读者在临床人群中对 DT 的真阳性率为 0.44 和 0.39,在筛查人群中为 0.10 和 0.05。DT 和 CT 对结节大小的测量之间未观察到显著的模态间偏差,但模态间的变化范围约为 30%。DT 的读者间测量也没有显示出显著的偏差,变化范围约为 15%。我们得出结论,与 CT 相比,DT 对结节的检测敏感性较差。然而,DT 显示出良好的测量可重复性,可能对监测现有肺结节的生长有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验