Williams T C, Kelijman M, Crelin W C, Downs T R, Frohman L A
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, Ohio 45267.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1988 Jan;66(1):39-45. doi: 10.1210/jcem-66-1-39.
We compared the ability of SRIH and SRIH analog, SMS 201-995 (SMS), to inhibit stimulated GH and TSH secretion in men who received 120-min iv infusions of saline, SRIH (5, 50, and 500 micrograms/h), and SMS (3, 30, and 300 ng/kg.h) together with a bolus iv injection of GHRH (1 microgram/kg) and TRH (500 micrograms). Integrated GH secretion during the 60 min after GHRH plus TRH injection was decreased compared to that after saline by (mean +/- SE) 32 +/- 14% (P = 0.059), 78 +/- 5% (P less than 0.001), and 88 +/- 3% (P less than 0.001) during the 5, 50, and 500 micrograms/h SRIH infusions, and by 13 +/- 7% (P = NS), 50 +/- 15% (P less than 0.05), and 80 +/- 6% (P less than 0.001) during the 3, 30, and 300 ng/kg.h SMS infusions. In contrast, integrated TSH secretion was unaltered during the 5 micrograms/h SRIH and 3 ng/kg.h SMS infusions; it decreased by only 43 +/- 5% (P less than 0.001) and 66 +/- 4% (P less than 0.001) during the 50 and 500 micrograms/h SRIH infusions and by 33 +/- 8% (P less than 0.05) and 50 +/- 3% (P less than 0.001) during the 30 and 300 ng/kg.h SMS infusions. Analysis of the dose-response curves indicated approximately 10- and 5-fold greater potencies of SRIH and SMS, respectively, in inhibiting GH as compared to TSH secretion. These results quantify the effect of SRIH as an inhibitor of GH secretion and suggest that if SRIH has a physiological role in the inhibition of TSH secretion in man, it is limited to conditions associated with marked suppression of GH.
我们比较了生长抑素(SRIH)及其类似物SMS 201-995(SMS)在接受静脉输注生理盐水、SRIH(5、50和500微克/小时)以及SMS(3、30和300纳克/千克·小时)120分钟的男性中抑制刺激的生长激素(GH)和促甲状腺激素(TSH)分泌的能力,同时静脉推注生长激素释放激素(GHRH,1微克/千克)和促甲状腺激素释放激素(TRH,500微克)。与输注生理盐水后相比,在注射GHRH加TRH后的60分钟内,GH的综合分泌在5、50和500微克/小时的SRIH输注期间分别降低了(均值±标准误)32±14%(P = 0.059)、78±5%(P<0.001)和88±3%(P<0.001),在3、30和300纳克/千克·小时的SMS输注期间分别降低了13±7%(P = 无显著性差异)、50±15%(P<0.05)和80±6%(P<0.001)。相比之下,在5微克/小时的SRIH和3纳克/千克·小时的SMS输注期间,TSH的综合分泌未改变;在50和500微克/小时的SRIH输注期间分别仅降低了43±5%(P<0.001)和66±4%(P<0.001),在30和300纳克/千克·小时的SMS输注期间分别降低了33±8%(P<0.05)和50±3%(P<0.001)。剂量-反应曲线分析表明,与抑制TSH分泌相比,SRIH和SMS抑制GH分泌的效力分别大约高10倍和5倍。这些结果量化了SRIH作为GH分泌抑制剂的作用,并表明如果SRIH在人体抑制TSH分泌中具有生理作用,那么它仅限于与GH显著抑制相关的情况。