Suppr超能文献

评估蛋白质印迹法、酶联免疫吸附测定法和乳胶凝集试验检测养殖马鹿血清中弓形虫抗体的效果。

Evaluation of Western blot, ELISA and latex agglutination tests to detect Toxoplasma gondii serum antibodies in farmed red deer.

作者信息

Patel Kandarp Khodidas, Howe Laryssa, Heuer Cord, Asher Geoffery William, Wilson Peter Raymond

机构信息

Institute of Veterinary, Animal, and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.

Institute of Veterinary, Animal, and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.

出版信息

Vet Parasitol. 2017 Sep 15;244:154-159. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Aug 9.

Abstract

Abortion due to Toxoplasma gondii has been suspected in New Zealand farmed red deer. However, knowledge around the epidemiology and prevalence of T. gondii in farmed red deer is limited. The aim of this study was to firstly, assess the sensitivity and specificity of two commercially available assays, ELISA and latex agglutination test (LAT), for use in deer and secondly, to estimate the sero-prevalence of T. gondii in red deer. A total of 252 sera from rising 2-year-old and adult hinds from 17 New Zealand red deer herds at early and late pregnancy scanning and from known aborted and/or non-aborted hinds were tested for the presence of T. gondii antibodies. Each assays' sensitivity and specificity was evaluated by both the Western Blot (WB) as a gold standard method and Bayesian latent class (BLC) analysis in the absence of a gold standard. The sensitivity and specificity for WB were 95.8% (95% credible interval: 89.5-99.2%) and 95.1% (95% credible interval: 90.6-98.1%), respectively. For the LAT at the manufacturer's recommended ≥1:32 cut-off titre, the sensitivity (88.7%, 95% credible interval: 80.8-94.7%) and specificity (74.3%, 95% credible interval: 67.5-80.5%) were lower and higher than the sensitivity (76.2%, 95% credible interval: 66.7-84.5%) and specificity (89.7%, 95% credible interval: 84.5-93.9%) at a ≥1:64 cut-off, using (BLC) analysis. Sensitivity and specificity of the LAT at cut-off titre of 1:32 were estimated to be 84.4% (95% CI: 74.9-90.9%) and 73.5% (95% CI: 65.8-79.9%) against WB. The LAT had better agreement with WB at cut-off titre of ≥1:64 than ≥1:32 (Kappa=0.63 vs 0.54). At optimised cut-off S/P of 15.5%, the sensitivity (98.8%, 95% credible interval 96.1-99.8%) and specificity (92.8%, 95% credible interval 88.9-95.7%) of the ELISA were higher and lower, respectively, than the sensitivity (85.1%, 95% credible interval 76.2-91.9%) and specificity (98.5%, 95% credible interval 96.9-99.4%) at manufacturer's cut-off S/P of 30%, from BLC analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of ELISA at S/P cut-off of 15.5% was 91.1% (95% CI: 83.2-96.1%) and 90.7% (95% CI: 85.2-94.7%), respectively, when assessed against WB. The sero-prevalence from ELISA and LAT, at cut-off of S/P 15.5% and ≥1:64, respectively, was not significantly different to that from WB (McNemar's Chi-square p=0.21 for ELISA and p=0.28 for LAT).

摘要

在新西兰养殖的马鹿中,怀疑存在因弓形虫感染导致的流产情况。然而,关于养殖马鹿中弓形虫的流行病学和流行率的知识有限。本研究的目的,一是评估两种市售检测方法(酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)和乳胶凝集试验(LAT))用于马鹿检测时的敏感性和特异性;二是估计马鹿中弓形虫的血清阳性率。对来自17个新西兰马鹿群中处于怀孕早期和晚期扫描阶段的2岁及成年母鹿的252份血清,以及已知流产和/或未流产母鹿的血清进行检测,以确定是否存在弓形虫抗体。每种检测方法的敏感性和特异性通过以蛋白质印迹法(WB)作为金标准方法进行评估,在没有金标准的情况下,还通过贝叶斯潜在类别(BLC)分析进行评估。WB的敏感性和特异性分别为95.8%(95%可信区间:89.5 - 99.2%)和95.1%(95%可信区间:90.6 - 98.1%)。对于LAT,在制造商推荐的≥1:32截断滴度下,使用BLC分析时,其敏感性(88.7%,95%可信区间:80.8 - 94.7%)和特异性(74.3%,95%可信区间:67.5 - 80.5%),低于在≥1:64截断值时的敏感性(76.2%,95%可信区间:66.7 - 84.5%)和特异性(89.7%,95%可信区间:84.5 - 93.9%)。以WB为对照,LAT在截断滴度为1:32时的敏感性和特异性估计分别为84.4%(95%置信区间:74.9 - 90.9%)和73.5%(95%置信区间:65.8 - 79.9%)。LAT在截断滴度≥1:64时与WB的一致性优于≥1:32时(Kappa值分别为0.63和0.54)。在优化的截断S/P值为15.5%时,ELISA的敏感性(98.8%,95%可信区间96.1 - 99.8%)和特异性(92.8%,95%可信区间88.9 - 95.7%),与制造商截断S/P值为30%时相比,分别更高和更低(来自BLC分析)。以WB为对照时,ELISA在S/P截断值为15.5%时的敏感性和特异性分别为91.1%(95%置信区间:83.2 - 96.1%)和90.7%(95%置信区间:85.2 - 94.7%)。ELISA和LAT在截断值分别为S/P 15.5%和≥1:64时的血清阳性率,与WB的血清阳性率相比无显著差异(ELISA的麦克内马尔卡方检验p = 0.21,LAT的p = 0.28)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验