de la Garza R, Johanson C E
University of Chicago, Department of Psychiatry, Illinois.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1987 Dec;243(3):955-62.
Rhesus monkeys were trained to discriminate intragastrically administered d-amphetamine (AMPH) or pentobarbital (PENTO) from saline using a signaled shock-avoidance trail procedure. All monkeys maintained criterion levels (greater than 90% drug-appropriate responding) throughout the duration of the study during training sessions. In the AMPH experiment, the anorectics diethylpropion, mazindol, phendimetrazine, phenmetrazine and phentermine completely substituted for the training dose of AMPH. The atypical antidepressant bupropion and the psychomotor stimulant methylphenidate also completely substituted for AMPH. Other anorectics including benzphetamine, clortermine, fenetylline, mefenorex and the psychomotor stimulant pemoline that share some pharmacological properties with AMPH substituted for AMPH in some, but not all, of the monkeys tested. The anorectics fenfluramine and chlorphentermine failed to substitute for AMPH. Drugs from other pharmacological classes such as morphine, diazepam, nortripyline and PENTO also failed to substitute for AMPH, indicating pharmacological specificity. In the PENTO experiment, the benzodiazepines alprazolam, bromazepam, diazepam, flurazepam, halazepam, lorazepam, midazolam, oxazepam, temazepam and triazolam and the sedatives methaqualone and phenobarbital completely substituted for the training dose of PENTO. The nonbenzodiazepine anxiolytic CL 218,872 only partially substituted for PENTO. In addition, morphine and AMPH failed to substitute for PENTO, indicating pharmacological specificity. In summary, drugs delivered intragastrically functioned as discriminative stimuli in a drug-class specific manner. The ability to use drugs delivered by this route as discriminative stimuli provides a way to compare anorectic drugs to AMPH or sedative drugs to PENTO under conditions that resemble the mode of human consumption to determine whether these drugs are likely to be associated with AMPH-like or PENTO-like drug dependence.
恒河猴接受训练,通过一种信号性电击回避试验程序,来区分经胃内给予的右旋苯丙胺(AMPH)或戊巴比妥(PENTO)与生理盐水。在整个研究期间的训练阶段,所有猴子都维持了标准水平(药物适应性反应大于90%)。在AMPH实验中,食欲抑制剂二乙丙胺苯丙酮、马吲哚、苯双甲吗啉、苯甲吗啉和芬特明完全替代了训练剂量的AMPH。非典型抗抑郁药安非他酮和精神运动兴奋剂哌甲酯也完全替代了AMPH。其他一些与AMPH具有某些药理学特性相同的食欲抑制剂,包括苄非他明、氯苯丁胺、芬乙茶碱、美芬雷司以及精神运动兴奋剂匹莫林,在部分(而非全部)受试猴子中替代了AMPH。食欲抑制剂芬氟拉明和氯苯丁胺未能替代AMPH。来自其他药理学类别的药物,如吗啡、地西泮、去甲替林和PENTO也未能替代AMPH,表明了药理学特异性。在PENTO实验中,苯二氮䓬类药物阿普唑仑、溴西泮、地西泮、氟西泮、哈拉西泮、劳拉西泮、咪达唑仑、奥沙西泮、替马西泮和三唑仑,以及镇静剂甲喹酮和苯巴比妥完全替代了训练剂量的PENTO。非苯二氮䓬类抗焦虑药CL 218,872仅部分替代了PENTO。此外,吗啡和AMPH未能替代PENTO,表明了药理学特异性。总之,经胃内给予的药物以药物类别特异性的方式发挥辨别性刺激的作用。利用这种给药途径的药物作为辨别性刺激的能力,提供了一种在类似于人类用药方式的条件下,将食欲抑制剂与AMPH进行比较,或将镇静药物与PENTO进行比较的方法,以确定这些药物是否可能与AMPH样或PENTO样药物依赖相关。