Nikanjam Mina, Patel Harsh, Kurzrock Razelle
Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Oncoimmunology. 2017 Jun 28;6(8):e1338997. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1338997. eCollection 2017.
Immunotherapy combinations are used to improve outcomes in metastatic cancer, but evidence-based knowledge of appropriate starting doses for novel combinations is lacking. Phase I-III adult combination clinical trials (≥ 1 drug was immunotherapy; anti-PD-1, PD-L1, or CTLA-4) were reviewed (PubMed Jan 1, 2010 to Sep 1, 2016; ASCO 2014-2016, ASH/ESMO 2014-2015 abstracts). The safe dose for each drug used in each combination was divided by the single-agent recommended dose to calculate dose percentage. Additive dose percentage was the sum of each dose percentage. Overall, 84 studies (N = 3,526 patients, 59 combinations) were analyzed. In 50% of studies, all drugs could be administered at full dose; 63%, in the presence of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and 36% with anti-CTLA-4. The lowest safe starting dose for a doublet combination including a second immunotherapy was 50% of each drug; 60%, for a targeted agent. Most doublet/triplets combining anti-PD-1/PD-L1 with cytotoxics were tolerable at full doses. Response rates (median [interquartile range]) were higher for 3-drug than 2-drug combinations (53% [33-63%] (N = 23 studies) vs. 23% [14-39%]) (N = 60 studies) (p < 0.0001) with similar rates seen for targeted, cytotoxic, biologic, or additional immunotherapy combinations (p = 0.35). In conclusion, anti-PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors can be safely given with a variety of other immunotherapy and targeted agents, albeit at about half dose. Doublet and triplet combinations with cytotoxics could mostly be given at full doses. Anti-CTLA-4 agents compromised dosing more than anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents. Response rates were significantly higher for 3- versus 2-drug combinations.
免疫疗法联合使用可改善转移性癌症的治疗效果,但对于新型联合疗法的合适起始剂量,仍缺乏基于证据的认识。我们回顾了I-III期成人联合临床试验(≥1种药物为免疫疗法;抗PD-1、PD-L1或CTLA-4)(PubMed 2010年1月1日至2016年9月1日;ASCO 2014 - 2016,ASH/ESMO 2014 - 2015摘要)。将每种联合疗法中使用的每种药物的安全剂量除以单药推荐剂量,以计算剂量百分比。相加剂量百分比为各剂量百分比之和。总体而言,共分析了84项研究(N = 3526例患者,59种联合疗法)。在50%的研究中,所有药物均可全剂量给药;在有抗PD-1/PD-L1的情况下为63%,有抗CTLA-4的情况下为36%。包括第二种免疫疗法的双联组合的最低安全起始剂量为每种药物的50%;靶向药物为60%。大多数将抗PD-1/PD-L1与细胞毒性药物联合的双联/三联组合全剂量使用时耐受性良好。三联药物组合的缓解率(中位数[四分位间距])高于双联药物组合(53% [33 - 63%](N = 23项研究)对23% [14 - 39%])(N = 60项研究)(p < 0.0001),靶向、细胞毒性、生物或其他免疫疗法联合组合的缓解率相似(p = 0.35)。总之,抗PD-1/PD-L1检查点抑制剂可与多种其他免疫疗法和靶向药物安全联用,尽管剂量约为一半。与细胞毒性药物的双联和三联组合大多可全剂量给药。抗CTLA-4药物比抗PD-1/PD-L1药物对剂量的影响更大。三联药物组合的缓解率显著高于双联药物组合。