Nelson Nancy C, Ostby Stuart A, Weaver Amy L, McGree Michaela E, Gebhart John B, Bakkum-Gamez Jamie N
From the Mayo School of Graduate Medical Education and.
Mayo Clinic School of Medicine.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018 Sep/Oct;24(5):347-351. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000470.
We describe a novel way to calculate estimated blood loss (EBL) using an intraoperative pictographic tool in gynecologic surgery.
A pictographic tool to estimate sponge saturation was developed to calculate EBL during surgery. A prospective cohort of women 18 years or older undergoing benign vaginal hysterectomy with planned adnexal surgery at Mayo Clinic were consented for use of the pictographic tool. Demographic, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were abstracted. Estimated blood loss was compared among surgeons, anesthesia providers, and the pictographic tool and then correlated with change in hemoglobin.
Eighty-one patients met inclusion with mean age of 45.3 ± 8.7 years. Successful vaginal hysterectomy was achieved in all patients with successful completion of planned adnexectomy in 69 (85.2%). Mean EBL among surgeons, anesthesia providers, and pictographic estimates, respectively, was as follows: 199.4 ± 81.9 mL, 195.5 ± 152.2 mL, and 288.5 ± 186.6 mL, with concordance correlation coefficients for surgeons and anesthesia providers versus pictographic tool of 0.40 (95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.51) and 0.68 (95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.79), respectively. The mean postoperative change in hemoglobin was -1.8 g/dL; there were no postoperative transfusions. Change in hemoglobin was more correlated with blood loss estimates from surgeons (r = -0.31, P = 0.008) and anesthesia providers (r = -0.37, P = 0.003) than the pictographic tool (r = -0.19, P = 0.11).
Use of a pictographic tool to objectively estimate blood loss demonstrated significant overestimations compared with both anesthesia providers' and surgeons' estimates because the pictographic tool was less correlated with postoperative change in hemoglobin than anesthesia provider and surgeon estimates.
我们描述了一种在妇科手术中使用术中象形工具计算估计失血量(EBL)的新方法。
开发了一种用于估计纱布饱和度的象形工具,以在手术期间计算EBL。梅奥诊所对18岁及以上计划进行附件手术的良性阴道子宫切除术的女性进行前瞻性队列研究,并征得她们同意使用该象形工具。提取人口统计学、术前、术中和术后数据。比较外科医生、麻醉医生和象形工具之间的估计失血量,然后将其与血红蛋白变化相关联。
81例患者符合纳入标准,平均年龄为45.3±8.7岁。所有患者均成功完成阴道子宫切除术,69例(85.2%)成功完成计划的附件切除术。外科医生、麻醉医生和象形估计的平均EBL分别如下:199.4±81.9 mL、195.5±152.2 mL和288.5±186.6 mL,外科医生和麻醉医生与象形工具的一致性相关系数分别为0.40(95%置信区间,0.29 - 0.51)和0.68(95%置信区间,0.57 - 0.79)。术后血红蛋白的平均变化为-1.8 g/dL;无术后输血情况。血红蛋白变化与外科医生(r = -0.31,P = 0.008)和麻醉医生(r = -0.37,P = 0.003)的失血量估计比与象形工具(r = -0.19,P = 0.11)的相关性更强。
与麻醉医生和外科医生的估计相比,使用象形工具客观估计失血量显示出显著高估,因为象形工具与术后血红蛋白变化的相关性低于麻醉医生和外科医生的估计。