Oeverhaus Michael, Witteler Tobias, Lax Hildegard, Esser Joachim, Führer Dagmar, Eckstein Anja
Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Essen (EUGOGO Center Essen), Essen, Germany.
Department of Medical Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.
Horm Metab Res. 2017 Oct;49(10):739-747. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-116945. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of intravenous (iv) glucocorticoids (GCs) with and without orbital radiotherapy (ORT) in a retrospective analysis of patients with active, moderate-to-severe Graves' orbitopathy (GO). Since diplopia has the strongest impact on quality of life, a careful work up of motility and binocular single vision (BSV) has been performed. The Essen-EUGOGO-Center database (n=3655) was screened for patients with untreated moderate-to-severe, active GO, onset ≤12 months. The inclusion criteria were met by 148 patients (n=76 ivGC, n=72 ivGC + ORT). We analyzed CAS (inactivation: ≤2), NOSPECS, lid-width, proptosis, motility, and field of BSV. To score the overall ophthalmic outcome, a severity-weighted-score (SOS) was compared with an established EUGOGO inflammation-weighted-score (IOS). Cumulative ivGCs dosages and duration of GO did not differ between the groups. Patients with combination therapy had a significantly more severe GO at baseline. Therefore, a subgroup with matched severity was additionally compared. In the IOS, both groups reached similar improvement rates (55.2 vs. 63.9%; p=0.31). However, in the SOS, the rates differed significantly (46.1 vs. 61.1%; p=0.03- unmatched and p=0.03 matched), despite similar rates of inactivation (65.8 vs. 63.8%). Impaired motility improved significantly more often after combination therapy (p=0.01 matched, p=0.004 unmatched). Treatment responders showed only partial improvement (proptosis: 2.5±0.5 mm; motility: 11.3±10.9°). In our retrospective analysis, combination therapy (ivGCs + ORT) was significantly more effective in reduction of severity and should therefore always be considered in moderate-to-severe GO stages, especially in the presence of motility disorders. However, the limited improvement in clinical parameters, despite the promising effect on inactivation of inflammation, has to be outlined to the patients.
本研究旨在通过对活动性、中重度格雷夫斯眼眶病(GO)患者进行回顾性分析,评估并比较静脉注射(iv)糖皮质激素(GCs)联合或不联合眼眶放疗(ORT)的疗效。由于复视对生活质量影响最大,因此对眼球运动和双眼单视(BSV)进行了详细检查。在埃森 - EUGOGO中心数据库(n = 3655)中筛选出中度至重度、活动性GO且发病时间≤12个月的未治疗患者。148例患者符合纳入标准(n = 76例接受静脉注射糖皮质激素,n = 72例接受静脉注射糖皮质激素 + 眼眶放疗)。我们分析了临床活动评分(CAS,缓解标准:≤2)、NOSPECS分级、睑裂宽度、眼球突出度、眼球运动及双眼单视视野。为评估总体眼科结局,将严重程度加权评分(SOS)与既定的EUGOGO炎症加权评分(IOS)进行比较。两组间静脉注射糖皮质激素的累积剂量和GO病程无差异。联合治疗组患者基线时GO病情明显更严重。因此,另外比较了病情严重程度匹配的亚组。在IOS中,两组的改善率相似(55.2%对63.9%;p = 0.31)。然而,在SOS中,尽管灭活率相似(65.8%对63.8%),但两组的改善率差异显著(46.1%对61.1%;未匹配组p = 0.03,匹配组p = 0.03)。联合治疗后眼球运动障碍改善更为显著(匹配组p = 0.01,未匹配组p = 0.004)。治疗反应者仅部分改善(眼球突出度:2.5±0.5毫米;眼球运动:11.3±10.9°)。在我们的回顾性分析中,联合治疗(静脉注射糖皮质激素 + 眼眶放疗)在降低严重程度方面明显更有效,因此在中重度GO阶段应始终予以考虑,尤其是存在眼球运动障碍时。然而,尽管对炎症灭活有显著效果,但临床参数改善有限,这一点必须告知患者。